skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present
Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox
open access
The primary aim of the present study was to describe
the safety profile of bevacizumab in routine practice. The most
common AEs observed were hypertension, proteinuria and epistaxis (open access),
which are known side effects of bevacizumab treatment. The risk of
the occurrence of such events may be dose-associated, as indicated
by the multivariate Cox regression analysis and by previously
published data (35–37).
Endpoints assessment (n=156)
The safety profile of bevacizumab was the primary
endpoint of the study. Secondary endpoints included the usage
conditions of bevacizumab (e.g., dose schedule, concurrent
chemotherapy) and survival rates. During bevacizumab therapy, AEs
potentially attributable to the monoclonal antibody were described
according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events,
Version 3.0 (31). The AEs of
particular interest in the present study were defined prior to data
collection, and focused on the following: Hypertension,
proteinuria, epistaxis, bleeding or hemorrhage, venous
thromboembolic event, arterial thromboembolic event, wound healing
complication, intestinal perforation, gastrointestinal (GI)
fistula, reversible posterior leak-encephalopathy syndrome and
pulmonary hypertension.
Overall survival (OS) was determined from the time
of bevacizumab introduction to the time of the mortality of the
patients (due to any cause). Progression-free survival (PFS) was
determined from the time of bevacizumab introduction to disease
progression or patient mortality. The data for patients who were
alive without undergoing disease progression were censored at the
date of their last assessment.
During bevacizumab treatment, disease progression
was evaluated by each treating physician through clinical
examination and/or carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) levels and/or
radiological examination. Biological progression was defined,
according to the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup criteria (32), as an increase of CA125 levels.
Determination of radiological and clinical progression relied on
physician judgement.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.