|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) is the transfer of cells into a patient.[1] The cells may have originated from the patient him- or herself and then been altered before being transferred back, or, they may have come from another individual. The cells are most commonly derived from the immune system, with the goal of transferring improved immune functionality and characteristics along with the cells back to the patient.
Full Text
Published: 17 May 2016
Tumor infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL)
Clinical activity of TILs
Ongoing clinical studies
NK cells and LAK cells
CIK cells
Clinical activity of NK, LAK and CIK cells agains ovarian cancer
Conclusions
Adoptive
cell-therapy has been shown to be an active treatment for different
kinds of cancers, such as melanoma and other solid and hematological
malignancies [31, 60, 61, 66, 72, 73].
The demonstration that the presence of inflammatory infiltrate
correlates with a better prognosis for patients with EOC, suggests that
it may be a relevant tool also in the treatment of EOC [6].
Results
of several preclinical studies indicate that both HLA unrestricted
immune effectors and HLA restricted T-lymphocytes have a cytotoxic
activity against EOC cells in vitro [46, 64].
However,
clinical research is still at an early stage and only few evidences of
efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy in EOC have been reported, in
particular regarding the addition of a maintenance therapy with CIK or
TIL to front line standard treatments. This additional therapy seems to
be able to improve clinical outcome prolonging PFS and OS in patients
with a newly diagnosed EOC [42, 55].
On the contrary, the few published clinical trials with NK in other
clinical settings such as multi-resistant EOC, were not able to
demonstrate any activity of adoptive immunotherapy.
An
Important issue that may significantly influence the outcome of
clinical ACT is the employment of preparative lymphodepleting regimens.
The scope of such treatments is to eliminate potentially
immune-suppressive elements and create an appropriate “immunologic
space” for the incoming immune effectors, reducing their competition for
sustaining cytokines. Currently, there is no agreement on what may be
the optimal lymphodepleting regimen. Combinations of Cyclofosfamide,
Fludarabine and low dose total body irradiaton (TBI) seem to provide the
best results and are therefore explored in clinical trials [23, 28].
The
definition of the most suitables T cell subtypes for ACT is current
object of intense research efforts; differentiation state of CD8+ T
cells is inversely related to their capacity to proliferate and persist.
These findings may be clinically relevant, and younger T cells are
statistically positively correlated with clinical effectiveness in ACT
trials [23, 28].
One
of the possible limits to the clinical employment of adoptive
immunotherapy is represented by the complexity of the procedures
involved in this kind of treatments.
Cell therapy must be
individualized, because the therapeutic agent is represented by
patient's own cells which have to be collected, expanded and finally
re-infused, with every step performed in GMP (Good manufacturing
practice) validated facilities according to rigorous and stringent
regulations. Personalization of adoptive cell-therapy, however, can
represent an advantage: each tumour has different biological and
molecular features and immunotherapies based on the use of autologous
cells, have potential of high specificity, not achievable with
chemotherapy.
Adoptive
immunotherapy seems to be generally well-tolerated and toxicities
reported are especially related to use of cytokines (such as IL-2) to
promote cellular expansion.
Other
important potential toxicities associated with ACT may be due to
undesired antigen-recognition in healthy organs or to massive cytokine
storm even if such events appear more likely to occur with genetically
redirected lymphocytes [74].
Furthermore,
the systemic administration of IL-2 might induce an undesired in vivo
expansion of T regulatory cells (Treg) that may counteract the
beneficial effect of ACT [23].
In
melanoma, the presence of TILs was shown to be functionally linked to
clinical benefit obtained with checkpoint inhibitors such as antibodies
blocking CTLA-4 and PD1 molecules [75, 76, 77].
Preclinical evidence on the importance of PD-1 expression in
Tumor-infiltrating NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cells is also available [78].
In relapsed resistant/refractory ovarian cancer anti PD-1/PD-L1
antibodies have shown promising activity with favourable safety profile [79, 80].
On
these bases, adoptive immunotherapy may potentially synergize with
checkpoint inhibitors treatments. This future perspective may be even
more applicable with genetically redirected T lymphocytes as supported
by encouraging preclinical evidence [81, 82].
NK
seems to be related to more severe toxicities, the only clinical trial
published, investigating NK efficacy in patients with multi-resistant
EOC reported a death for tumor lysis syndrome, two cases of passenger
lymphocyte syndrome, an autoimmune haemolytic anaemia and no improvement
of clinical outcome [67].
Although the prognostic role of NK cells infiltration is still
controversial, with published article that suggest their negative
prognostic role [83].
In
conclusion, application of adoptive cell therapy against EOC appears as
a promising perspective, not yet sufficiently supported by convincing
clinical data. It seem reasonable that adoptive cell therapy may provide
the best benefit in settings of low tumor burden, minimal residual
disease, or maintenance therapy. These concepts should be incorporated
and integrated in the multidisciplinary therapeutic strategy of ovarian
cancer [84].
The
complexity and costs required to explore clinical applications of these
approaches remain open issues that may be faced if supported by further
and stronger preclinical evidences.
Further
studies are therefore needed to better define the patterns involved in
the immune response to EOC and the escape mechanisms allowing neoplastic
cells survival and proliferation, in order to develop strategies to
make adoptive immunotherapy clinically effective.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.