|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEJM
June 16, 2016
To the Editor:
A point of contention that I have with the article by Hartmann and Lindor (Feb. 4 issue)1
has to do with the role of hysterectomy at the time of bilateral
risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. The use of tamoxifen for
chemoprevention is not a justification to proceed with a concurrent
hysterectomy. Better alternatives — aromatase inhibitors such as
exemestane, for instance — have now proved to be effective for risk
reduction in postmenopausal women, including those who have had their
ovaries removed, and do not increase the risk of endometrial cancer.
Similarly, the use of combination hormone therapy with continuous
estrogen and progesterone has not been associated with an increased risk
of endometrial cancer; in fact, some studies suggest the contrary.2,3
The hysterectomy itself adds substantial risk to a relatively low-risk
procedure and cannot be justified without a survival advantage and
certainly not by the supposed advantage of hormonal therapy.4
1. | Risk-Reducing Surgery in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. |
MacInnis RJ, Pike MC, Hopper JL. | |
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2403-2404. | |
PMID: 27305206 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] | |
2. | Risk-Reducing Surgery in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. |
Karam A. | |
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2403-2404. | |
PMID: 27305205 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] | |
3. | Risk-Reducing Surgery in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. |
[No authors listed] | |
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2403-2404. | |
PMID: 27305204 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] | |
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.