|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
medical news
Can Urol Assoc J.
Introduction
Cancers
of the upper urinary tract are common, with an estimated 63 920 new
cases involving the kidney/renal pelvis and at least 3000 new cases
involving the ureter in the U.S. in 2014.1
Tumours originating in the renal parenchyma are usually treated with
radical or partial nephrectomy, and tumours originating in the upper
tract urothelium (ureter and renal pelvis) are usually treated with
nephroureterectomy, where the ureter is removed in addition to the
kidney.2–4
Laparoscopic
renal surgery has become the standard of care for patients with
low-stage malignancies because this approach is associated with easier
convalescence and equivalent cancer outcomes.5
Both laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) and laparoscopic
nephroureterectomy (LNU) have been associated with reduced blood loss,
complications, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay compared
to open surgery.3,4,6,7
While
LRN and LNU are performed for different malignancies, the operative
steps are similar, with the exception of the distal ureter and bladder
dissection required for LNU. Because LRN and LNU are technically
similar, some surgeons and patients may believe the perioperative risks
are the same. Furthermore, since LRN is performed more often than LNU,
surgeons may be disproportionately influenced by the experience of LRN
patients.
The objective of this study
was to compare postoperative complications up to 30 days following
surgery for patients undergoing LRN and LNU. We hypothesized that the
frequency and type of postoperative complications experienced after LRN
and LNU would be different. Directly comparing postoperative
complications of LRN and LNU will allow clinicians to better prepare and
counsel patients for surgery.....
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.