Preoperative risk stratification of children with ovarian tumors

abstract

BACKGROUND:

The appropriate operative approach to pediatric patients with ovarian tumors must balance real risk of malignancy with maximal preservation of reproductive potential. We evaluate preoperative risk of malignancy in order to more precisely guide treatment, so as to err on the side of ovarian preservation if at all possible.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients undergoing surgical intervention for ovarian tumors at a single institution. The primary endpoint was ovarian malignancy.

RESULTS:

Of 502 patients who underwent surgery for ovarian tumors, 44 (8.8%) had malignancies. Malignancy rate (95% confidence interval) was low for cystic lesions <9cm (0.0%, 0.0-2.9%) and for tumor marker-negative heterogeneous lesions <9cm (2.3%, 0.4-12.1%). High-risk profiles for malignancy included tumor marker-positive heterogeneous lesions (66.7%, 35.4-87.9%) and solid tumors ≥9cm (69.2%, 16.2-40.3%). Intermediate risk tumors included cystic tumors ≥9cm (6.8%, 3.5-20.7%), tumor marker-negative heterogeneous lesions ≥9cm (31.2%, 18.0-48.6%), and solid tumors <9cm (11.1%, 4.4-25.3%).

CONCLUSIONS:

We developed a decision strategy to help determine which patients may or may not benefit from an ovarian-sparing approach. This proposed strategy warrants prospective application and validation. Ultimately, the decision to pursue an oncologic surgery with oophorectomy and staging (as opposed to fertility-preserving surgery) should be made after individualized discussion involving the surgeon, patient, and family.