|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
abstract
Efficacy and Mechanisms of Aerobic Exercise on Cancer Initiation, Progression, and Metastasis: A Critical Systematic Review of In Vivo Preclinical Data
P
A
major objective of the emerging field of exercise–oncology research is
to determine the efficacy of, and biological mechanisms by which,
aerobic exercise affects cancer incidence, progression, and/or
metastasis. There is a strong inverse association between self-reported
exercise and the primary incidence of several forms of cancer;
similarly, emerging data suggest that exercise exposure after a cancer
diagnosis may improve outcomes for early-stage breast, colorectal, or
prostate cancer. Arguably, critical next steps in the development of
exercise as a candidate treatment in cancer control require preclinical
studies to validate the biological efficacy of exercise, identify the
optimal “dose”, and pinpoint mechanisms of action. To evaluate the
current evidence base, we conducted a critical systematic review of in vivo
studies investigating the effects of exercise in cancer prevention and
progression. Studies were evaluated on the basis of tumor outcomes
(e.g., incidence, growth, latency, metastasis), dose–response, and
mechanisms of action, when available. A total of 53 studies were
identified and evaluated on tumor incidence (n = 24), tumor growth (n = 33), or metastasis (n
= 10). We report that the current evidence base is plagued by
considerable methodologic heterogeneity in all aspects of study design,
endpoints, and efficacy. Such heterogeneity precludes meaningful
comparisons and conclusions at present. To this end, we provide a
framework of methodologic and data reporting standards to strengthen the
field to guide the conduct of high-quality studies required to inform
translational, mechanism-driven clinical trials. Cancer Res; 76(14); 4032–50. ©2016 AACR.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.