|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poor concordance between CA-125 and RECIST at the time of disease progression in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: analysis of the AURELIA trial
abstract
July 11, 2016
Background Data on
CA-125 as a predictor of disease progression (PD) in ovarian cancer come
predominantly from patients with platinum-sensitive
disease receiving chemotherapy alone. We
assessed concordance between CA-125-defined and RECIST-defined PD using
data from
the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG)
randomized phase III AURELIA trial in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
(PROC).
Patients and methods
Patients with PROC were randomized to receive single-agent chemotherapy
with or without bevacizumab. PD by CA-125 was defined
according to GCIG criteria (except that
confirmatory CA-125 measurement was not required). This exploratory
analysis included
patients with RECIST PD and a CA-125 reading ≤28
days before and ≤21 days after RECIST-defined PD.
Results Of 218 eligible patients, only 94 (43%, 95% confidence interval 36% to 50%) had concordant RECIST and CA-125 PD status (42%
in the chemotherapy-alone arm; 45% in the bevacizumab combination arm, P
= 0.6). There was no evidence of CA-125-defined PD in the remaining 124
patients despite PD according to imaging. There were
no significant differences in baseline
characteristics between patients with PD defined by both RECIST and
CA-125 and those
with RECIST-only PD. CA-125 was even less
sensitive in detecting PD in patients with early (<8 weeks after
randomization)
compared with later RECIST-defined PD (69%
versus 53%, respectively, not meeting CA-125 criteria; P = 0.053). There was no significant difference in survival after PD in patients with concordant PD by RECIST and CA-125 versus
those with PD only by RECIST. We validated our findings in an independent study population of PROC.
Conclusions In this
platinum-resistant population, PD was typically detected earlier by
imaging than by CA-125, irrespective of bevacizumab
treatment. Disease status by CA-125 at the time
of PD was not prognostic for overall survival. Regular radiologic
assessment
as well as symptom benefit assessment should be
considered during PROC follow-up.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.