For many years,
pathologists, clinicians, and researchers assumed that OCs arise from
the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) primarily because the dominant, and
sometimes only, mass is found in the ovaries of women at presentation.
The problem was compounded by the presence of widely disseminated
disease at the time of diagnosis in many women with OC, particularly
those with HGSC – obscuring potential “in situ” or precursor lesions.
Many, if not most, HGSCs are now believed to arise from Müllerian
epithelium, specifically the fallopian tube epithelium (FTE) on the
tubal fimbriae, rather than the OSE
[9] and
[10].
The notion that HGSC often arises in the fallopian tube is strongly
supported by the identification of occult tubal HGSCs and their
presumptive precursors known as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas
(STICs) in up to 12% of women with germline
BRCA1/2 mutations who underwent risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy
[11],
[12],
[13],
[14],
[15] and
[16].
Importantly, in a study in which all resected fallopian tube tissue was
examined from 41 women with tubo-ovarian or primary peritoneal HGSCs,
tubal origin was presumed in nearly two-thirds based on the presence of
tubal HGSC or STIC
[17].
In three additional studies, STIC or invasive HGSC was confined to the
tube in 22 of 29 cases in which tubo-ovarian HGSC was incidentally found
in women without known or suspected genetic predisposition
[18],
[19] and
[20].
Collectively, these reports provide strong evidence for tubal origin of
sporadic HGSCs as well those arising in the high-risk context.
While
supporting the conclusion that most HGSCs likely arise from tubal
precursors, these studies raise
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.