PBS Documentary Climb For Life: A Legacy
Sent from my iPhone
Do you want a say in how ovarian cancer drugs are evaluated, approved and covered? We pleased to announce that the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance is partnering with the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) on a first-of-its-kind survey for women with ovarian cancer. Your input will help the Alliance and SGO better understand the patient perspective on outcomes from clinical research–and could shape future research.
We urge all ovarian cancer survivors to click this link and complete our short survey. We want to know which endpoints are meaningful to you, and what impact various side effects have on your quality of life.
We're all used to seeing the outcomes of clinical trials reported in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse events. Those measures are the basis for whether drugs are approved by the FDA and covered by major health insurers. But what do these outcomes really mean for women with ovarian cancer?
Please help us by completing the survey and sharing it with other women with ovarian cancer. Your responses are completely anonymous. The results from this survey will be used to draft a white paper guiding future research on ovarian cancer.
If you have any questions about this survey, feel free to contact the Alliance at ocna@ovariancancer.org or (202) 331-1332.
British Journal of Cancer 107, 612-616 (7 August 2012) |doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.325
Venous thromboembolism is a relevant and underestimated adverse event in cancer patients treated in phase I studies
Background:
To investigate, retrospectively, the role of tumour histotype and antiangiogenic drugs for venous thromboembolism (VTE) development in advanced cancer patients treated in phase I studies.
Methods:
Patients enrolled and treated in phase I studies conducted by SENDO (Southern Europe New Drugs Organisation) were considered.
Results:
Data of 1415 patients were included in the analysis: 526 (37.2%) patients were males, median age was 57.3 years (range: 13–85). Fifty-six (3.96%) patients developed a VTE. At multivariate analysis gynaecologic (hazard ratio (HR): 2.8, 95%confidence interval (CI): 1.29–6.23, P=0.009) and gastrointestinal tumours (HR: 3.23, 95% CI: 1.18–8.87, P=0.023) as well as combination regimens of cytotoxic and antiangiogenic agents (HR: 2.6, 95%CI: 1.11–6.30, P=0.028), white blood cell >11 000 μl−1 (HR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.10–6.09, P=0.028) and haemoglobin<10 g dl−1 (HR: 3.1, 95%CI: 1.07–8.94, P=0.037) were statistically correlated with VTE development. Venous thromboembolism was the fourth most common cause of drug discontinuation. The median time from first drug administration to discontinuation was 1.4 for VTE and 2.3 months for the other adverse events (P=0.02).
Conclusion:
Venous thromboembolism is a relatively common complication among patients treated in the context of phase I studies, and may lead to early drug discontinuation. A greater risk of developing VTE is associated with the diagnosis of gynaecologic and gastrointestinal tumours and the combined use of chemotherapy and antiangiogenic drugs.
Current definitions of "symptom burden" are largely derived from clinicians, and there are many variations in the way the term is used, defined, and operationalized. The aim of this study was to explore patient perceptions of symptom burden in the context of advanced and incurable disease. A group of 58 cancer patients followed by a palliative care team answered a single open-ended question: "Please define 'symptom burden'". Three authors independently coded and analyzed patient responses using a grounded theory approach. They identified six themes, the most frequently coded of which were: "can't do usual activities", "psychological suffering" and "specific severe symptoms". Our findings indicate that the concept of symptom burden is complex and extends beyond numerical symptom-scoring systems. In addition to inquiring about specific symptoms, it may be important to directly ask patients about their overall burden or experience of symptoms.
PURPOSE: Studies in non-gynecologic tumors indicate metformin inhibits growth of cancer stem cells (CSC). Diabetic patients with ovarian cancer who are taking metformin have better outcomes than those not taking metformin. The purpose of this study was to directly address the impact of metformin on ovarian CSC.
METHODS: The impact of metformin on ovarian cancer cell line growth and viability was assessed ......,,
OBJECTIVE: The clinical benefit of routine follow-up in patients treated for ovarian cancer is subject to debate. In this study, the magnitude of the potential survival benefit of routine examinations was evaluated by Markov modeling.
METHODS: The clinical course of ovarian cancer was simulated using a 4-state nonstationary Markov model. Risk of recurrence and mortality probabilities were derived from individual patient data and Statistics Netherlands. The life expectancy was simulated for 3 follow-up scenarios: a current, withholding (all recurrences detected symptomatically), and perfect follow-up program (all recurrences detected asymptomatically). The impact of effective recurrence treatment in the future was modeled by varying the mortality ratio between patients with asymptomatically versus symptomatically detected recurrences. The model was validated using empirical data.
RESULTS: The mean life expectancy of patients, aged 58 years and in complete clinical remission after primary treatment, was 10.8 years. Varying the transition probabilities with ±25% changed the life expectancy by up to 1.1 years. The modeled life expectancy for the withholding and perfect follow-up scenarios was also 10.8 years and insensitive to model assumptions. In patients with stages IIB to IV, the life expectancy was 7.0 years, irrespective of follow-up strategy. A mortality ratio of 0.8 for patients with asymptomatically versus symptomatically detected recurrences resulted in a gain in life expectancy of 5 months for withholding versus perfect follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine follow-up in ovarian cancer patients is not expected to improve the life expectancy. The timing of detection of recurrent ovarian cancer is immaterial until markedly improved treatment options become available.
Possession of a BRCA1/2 mutation increases risk of contralateral breast and ovarian cancer recurrence and may have an impact on health management decisions, such as imaging screening, preventive surgical interventions and systemic therapies. A hospital-based study was conducted to assess the frequency and spectrum of pathogenic germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Polish women with familial and nonfamilial breast cancer. Genomic DNA was extracted from 1581 women with breast cancer and from 2225 healthy individuals. For genotyping BRCA1 (5382insC, T300G, 3819del5, 185delAG, C5370T, 3875del4, 3896delT, 4153delA, 4184del4, 4160delAG, G5332A) mutations and BRCA2 (G1408T, 5467insT, 6174delT, 6192delAT, 6675delTA, 8138del5, 9152delT, C9610T, 9630delC) mutations, a Custom TaqMan (Applied Biosystems) PCR-based technology was adopted. A BRCA1 mutation was found in 26 and 12.5 % of women with familial breast cancer and in 13 and 8.3 % nonfamilial (sporadic) breast cancer, diagnosed before or after 50 years of age, respectively. A much lower frequency of BRCA2 mutation was observed. The predominance of seven BRCA1 mutations (5382insC, T300G, 3819del5, 185delAG, C5370T, 3875del4, 4153delA) studied in the Masovian voivodeship population confirmed a strong founder effect for BRCA1 mutations in the Polish population, and the results of BRCA2 testing confirmed a high diversity in the studied pathogenic mutations in BRCA2 gene. We propose offering inexpensive testing for the presence of BRCA1 founder mutations to all Polish women at the time of initial breast cancer diagnosis, regardless of the patient's family history or age of disease onset.
