OVARIAN CANCER and US

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

PBS Documentary Climb for Life: A Legacy at REI Salt Lake City



PBS Documentary Climb For Life: A Legacy

Join the HERA Women's Cancer Foundation as they celebrate their 10th anniversary! Learn about the life and work of HERA's founder, Sean Patrick, through KUED's PBS documentary , Climb for Life: A Legacy. In establishing HERA, she gathered a community, became a catalyst for change, and even after her death, inspires the critical quest for ovarian cancer research and awareness. Also hear from survivors and meet others dedicated to the cause. Light refreshments will be served. HERA's largest national event, Climb4Life Utah, offers an incredible weekend of climbing, hiking and shooting photos in the majestic Wasatch Mountains to raise funds for ovarian cancer research and awareness.

Date: Aug 8, 2012 Time: 7 pmPhone: 801-486-2100Address: 3285 East 3300 South, Salt Lake City, 84124Where: REI Salt Lake City



Sent from my iPhone

Tuesday, August 07, 2012

Chemotherapy May Co-opt Healthy Cells to Support Tumors « news@JAMA



Chemotherapy May Co-opt Healthy Cells to Support Tumors « news@JAMA

Why People Stick with Cancer Screening, Even When It Causes Harm (media)



http://healthland.time.com/2012/05/25/why-people-cling-to-cancer-screening-and-other-questionable-medical-interventions-even-when-they-cause-harm/

Families should not be allowed to veto dead relatives' organ donation wishes



http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-08/bmj-fsn080612.php

Ovarian Cancer National Alliance- Help Us Shape Future Ovarian Cancer Research by Answering a Brief Survey (2nd link)



Check out this post: http://www.ovariancancer.org/2012/08/07/help-us-shape-future-ovarian-cancer-research-by-answering-a-brief-survey/


Sent from my iPhone

Survey-Ovarian cancer survivors - SGO / Ovarian Cancer National Alliance




Do you want a say in how ovarian cancer drugs are evaluated, approved and covered? We pleased to announce that the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance is partnering with the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) on a first-of-its-kind survey for women with ovarian cancer. Your input will help the Alliance and SGO better understand the patient perspective on outcomes from clinical research–and could shape future research.

We urge all ovarian cancer survivors to click this link and complete our short survey. We want to know which endpoints are meaningful to you, and what impact various side effects have on your quality of life.

We're all used to seeing the outcomes of clinical trials reported in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse events. Those measures are the basis for whether drugs are approved by the FDA and covered by major health insurers. But what do these outcomes really mean for women with ovarian cancer?

Please help us by completing the survey and sharing it with other women with ovarian cancer. Your responses are completely anonymous. The results from this survey will be used to draft a white paper guiding future research on ovarian cancer.

If you have any questions about this survey, feel free to contact the Alliance at ocna@ovariancancer.org or (202) 331-1332.




Sent from my iPhone

: Venous thromboembolism is a relevant and underestimated adverse event in cancer patients treated in phase I studiesBritish Journal of Cancer




Clinical Study

British Journal of Cancer 107, 612-616 (7 August 2012) |doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.325

Venous thromboembolism is a relevant and underestimated adverse event in cancer patients treated in phase I studies

Background:

To investigate, retrospectively, the role of tumour histotype and antiangiogenic drugs for venous thromboembolism (VTE) development in advanced cancer patients treated in phase I studies.

Methods:

Patients enrolled and treated in phase I studies conducted by SENDO (Southern Europe New Drugs Organisation) were considered.

Results:

Data of 1415 patients were included in the analysis: 526 (37.2%) patients were males, median age was 57.3 years (range: 13–85). Fifty-six (3.96%) patients developed a VTE. At multivariate analysis gynaecologic (hazard ratio (HR): 2.8, 95%confidence interval (CI): 1.29–6.23, P=0.009) and gastrointestinal tumours (HR: 3.23, 95% CI: 1.18–8.87, P=0.023) as well as combination regimens of cytotoxic and antiangiogenic agents (HR: 2.6, 95%CI: 1.11–6.30, P=0.028), white blood cell >11000μl−1 (HR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.10–6.09, P=0.028) and haemoglobin<10gdl−1 (HR: 3.1, 95%CI: 1.07–8.94, P=0.037) were statistically correlated with VTE development. Venous thromboembolism was the fourth most common cause of drug discontinuation. The median time from first drug administration to discontinuation was 1.4 for VTE and 2.3 months for the other adverse events (P=0.02).

Conclusion:

Venous thromboembolism is a relatively common complication among patients treated in the context of phase I studies, and may lead to early drug discontinuation. A greater risk of developing VTE is associated with the diagnosis of gynaecologic and gastrointestinal tumours and the combined use of chemotherapy and antiangiogenic drugs.




Foundation Medicine and Clovis Oncology form alliance - Mass High Tech Business News



Foundation Medicine and Clovis Oncology form alliance - Mass High Tech Business News

Oxigene Announces Phase 2 Ovarian Cancer Trial of Zybrestat Plus Bevacizumab Achieves Important Interim Safety Objective



http://pharmalive.com/News/Index.cfm?articleid=851802

What is symptom burden: a qualitative exploration of patient definitions.



What is symptom burden: a qualitative exploration of patient definitions.


J Palliat Care. 2012 Summer

Abstract

Current definitions of "symptom burden" are largely derived from clinicians, and there are many variations in the way the term is used, defined, and operationalized. The aim of this study was to explore patient perceptions of symptom burden in the context of advanced and incurable disease. A group of 58 cancer patients followed by a palliative care team answered a single open-ended question: "Please define 'symptom burden'". Three authors independently coded and analyzed patient responses using a grounded theory approach. They identified six themes, the most frequently coded of which were: "can't do usual activities", "psychological suffering" and "specific severe symptoms". Our findings indicate that the concept of symptom burden is complex and extends beyond numerical symptom-scoring systems. In addition to inquiring about specific symptoms, it may be important to directly ask patients about their overall burden or experience of symptoms.





Ovarian cancer and smoking





Reply to "How to improve cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer and talk about it in a common language" pay walled



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22864110/?i=12&from=ovarian%20cancer

Metformin Targets Ovarian Cancer Stem ...



Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies in non-gynecologic tumors indicate metformin inhibits growth of cancer stem cells (CSC). Diabetic patients with ovarian cancer who are taking metformin have better outcomes than those not taking metformin. The purpose of this study was to directly address the impact of metformin on ovarian CSC.

METHODS: The impact of metformin on ovarian cancer cell line growth and viability was assessed ......,,


Impact of Routine Follow-Up Examinations on Life Expectancy in Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Simulation Study.



Impact of Routine Follow-Up Examinations on Life Expectancy in Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Simulation Study.

 

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The clinical benefit of routine follow-up in patients treated for ovarian cancer is subject to debate. In this study, the magnitude of the potential survival benefit of routine examinations was evaluated by Markov modeling.

METHODS: The clinical course of ovarian cancer was simulated using a 4-state nonstationary Markov model. Risk of recurrence and mortality probabilities were derived from individual patient data and Statistics Netherlands. The life expectancy was simulated for 3 follow-up scenarios: a current, withholding (all recurrences detected symptomatically), and perfect follow-up program (all recurrences detected asymptomatically). The impact of effective recurrence treatment in the future was modeled by varying the mortality ratio between patients with asymptomatically versus symptomatically detected recurrences. The model was validated using empirical data.

RESULTS: The mean life expectancy of patients, aged 58 years and in complete clinical remission after primary treatment, was 10.8 years. Varying the transition probabilities with ±25% changed the life expectancy by up to 1.1 years. The modeled life expectancy for the withholding and perfect follow-up scenarios was also 10.8 years and insensitive to model assumptions. In patients with stages IIB to IV, the life expectancy was 7.0 years, irrespective of follow-up strategy. A mortality ratio of 0.8 for patients with asymptomatically versus symptomatically detected recurrences resulted in a gain in life expectancy of 5 months for withholding versus perfect follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: Routine follow-up in ovarian cancer patients is not expected to improve the life expectancy. The timing of detection of recurrent ovarian cancer is immaterial until markedly improved treatment options become available.




Systematic lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer at second-look surgery: a randomised clinical trial.



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22864456/?i=8&from=ovarian%20cancer

High frequency of BRCA1 founder mutation in Polish women with non familial breast cancer



High frequency of BRCA1 founder mutations in Polish women with nonfamilial breast cancer.

Abstract

Possession of a BRCA1/2 mutation increases risk of contralateral breast and ovarian cancer recurrence and may have an impact on health management decisions, such as imaging screening, preventive surgical interventions and systemic therapies. A hospital-based study was conducted to assess the frequency and spectrum of pathogenic germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Polish women with familial and nonfamilial breast cancer. Genomic DNA was extracted from 1581 women with breast cancer and from 2225 healthy individuals. For genotyping BRCA1 (5382insC, T300G, 3819del5, 185delAG, C5370T, 3875del4, 3896delT, 4153delA, 4184del4, 4160delAG, G5332A) mutations and BRCA2 (G1408T, 5467insT, 6174delT, 6192delAT, 6675delTA, 8138del5, 9152delT, C9610T, 9630delC) mutations, a Custom TaqMan (Applied Biosystems) PCR-based technology was adopted. A BRCA1 mutation was found in 26 and 12.5 % of women with familial breast cancer and in 13 and 8.3 % nonfamilial (sporadic) breast cancer, diagnosed before or after 50 years of age, respectively. A much lower frequency of BRCA2 mutation was observed. The predominance of seven BRCA1 mutations (5382insC, T300G, 3819del5, 185delAG, C5370T, 3875del4, 4153delA) studied in the Masovian voivodeship population confirmed a strong founder effect for BRCA1 mutations in the Polish population, and the results of BRCA2 testing confirmed a high diversity in the studied pathogenic mutations in BRCA2 gene. We propose offering inexpensive testing for the presence of BRCA1 founder mutations to all Polish women at the time of initial breast cancer diagnosis, regardless of the patient's family history or age of disease onset.




Sent from my iPhone

The Microculture-Kinetic (MiCK) Assay: The Role of a Drug-Induced Apoptosis Assay in Drug Development and Clinical Care.



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22865459/?i=5&from=ovarian%20cancer

Sunday, August 05, 2012

Vitamins & Supplements - Sept 2012 Consumer Reports Investigates



Vitamins & Supplements - Consumer Reports Investigates

paywalled: Patients with Lynch Syndrome Mismatch Repair Gene Mutations Are at Higher Risk for Not Only Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer but Also Bladder Cancer



Patients with Lynch Syndrome Mismatch Repair Gene Mutations Are at Higher Risk for Not Only Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer but Also Bladder Cancer

Abstract

Background

Lynch syndrome (LS), or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, is caused by mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. An increased risk for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has been described in this population; however, data regarding the risk for bladder cancer (BCa) are sparse.

Objective

To assess the risk of BCa in MMR mutation carriers and suggest screening and management recommendations.

Design, setting, and participants

Cancer data from 1980 to 2007 were obtained from the Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry in Toronto for 321 persons with known MMR mutations: mutL homolog 1, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 2 (E. coli) (MLH1); mutS homolog 2, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 1 (E. coli) (MSH2); mutS homolog 6 (E. coli) (MSH6); and PMS2 postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (S. cerevisiae) (PMS2).

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Standardized incidence ratios from the Ontario Cancer Registry, using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results public database, were used to compare cancer risk in patients with MMR mutations with the Canadian population. Microsatellite instability analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC) of the MMR proteins were also performed and the results compared with matched sporadic bladder tumors.

Results and limitations

Eleven of 177 patients with MSH2 mutations (6.21%, p < 0.001 compared with the Canadian population) were found to have BCa, compared with 3 of 129 patients with MLH1 mutations (2.32%, p > 0.05). Of these 11 tumors, 81.8% lacked expression of MSH2 on IHC, compared with the matched sporadic cases, which all displayed normal expression of MSH2 and MLH1. The incidence of UTUC among MSH2 carriers was 3.95% (p < 0.001), and all tumors were found to be deficient in MSH2 expression on IHC. Mutations in the intron 5 splice site and exon 7 of the MSH2 gene increased the risk of urothelial cancer. Limitations include possible inflated risk estimates due to ascertainment bias.

Conclusions

LS patients with MSH2 mutations are at an increased risk for not only UTUC but also BCa and could be offered appropriate screening.


Figures and tables from this article:
Full-size image (105K)
Fig. 1. Tumor sections at ×200 magnification: (A) abnormal MSH2 expression—nuclear expression is lost in the tumor, with normal nuclear staining in the adjacent tissue; (B) normal MLH1 expression—normal strong nuclear expression in the tumor and normal tissue.
View Within Article
Table 1. Distribution of patients with mismatch repair mutations
View table in article
M:F = male-to-female; MLH1 = mutL homolog 1, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 2 (E. coli); MSH2 = mutS homolog 2, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 1 (E. coli); MSH6 = mutS homolog 6 (E. coli); PMS2 = PSM2 postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (S. cerevisiae).
View Within Article
Table 2. Total incidence of urothelial cancers due to MLH1 and MSH2
View table in article
MLH1 = mutL homolog 1, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 2 (E. coli); MSH2 = mutS homolog 2, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 1 (E. coli); NS = not significant.
View Within Article
Table 3. Urothelial cancers in patients with confirmed MSH2 mutations and comparison with matched sporadic bladder cancer patients
View table in article
− = absent expression; +  = normal expression; CR = colorectal; Dx = diagnosis; EM = endometrial; F = female; GA = gastric; HG = high grade; IHC = immunohistochemistry; LG = low grade; LS = Lynch syndrome; M = male; MSH2 = mutS homolog 2, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 1 (E. coli); MSI = microsatellite instability; MSI-H = high microsatellite instability; MSS = microsatellite stable; OR = occupational risk; OV = ovarian; RP = renal pelvis; U = ureter.Patients H1 and H2 are related.
View Within Article
Table 4. Urothelial cancers in patients with confirmed MLH1 mutations
View table in article
− = absent expression; +  = normal expression; CR = colorectal; HG = high grade; IHC = immunohistochemistry; LG = low grade; LS = Lynch syndrome; M = male; MLH1 = mutL homolog 1, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 2 (E. coli); MSI = microsatellite instability; MSI-H = high microsatellite instability; OR = occupational risk; RP = renal pelvis.

How to generalize efficacy results of randomized trials: recommendations based on a systematic review of possible approaches



How to generalize efficacy results of randomized trials: recommendations based on a systematic review of possible approaches:

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the preferred source for evidence for the effect of treatment. However, patients participating in RCTs often manifest important differences from patients seen in practice. Therefore, guideline developers have to decide whether the results are generalizable to the target population not represented in RCTs.

Method

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify methods to decide whether to generalize the results from RCTs to patients who were not represented in these trials.

Results

One approach is to examine the in- and exclusion criteria of trials and infer from these whether the trial population was sufficiently representative. Other authors suggest, because of the inclusion of a broader range of patients, reliance on observational studies if no direct evidence for the target population is available.
Another approach is to apply the relative effect of treatment found in trials to patients in practice unless there is a compelling reason to believe the results would differ substantially as a function of particular characteristics of those patients. Although there are exceptions, this approach is supported by empirical evidence that, in general, relative effect of treatment on benefit outcomes seldom differs to an important extent across subgroups of patients.

Conclusion

We propose this last approach: focusing on RCTs unless there is a compelling reason not to do so. Compelling reasons will most often be found with respect to issues of rare adverse effects, for which observational studies are likely to provide the best estimates.

Medscape: Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Adenoma Removal




Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Adenoma Removal