|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: search results show there is no reference either in the body of the paper nor in the references section to ovarian cancer
"Conclusion
Despite limitations in the research, there is reasonable evidence that psychosocial
and supportive care needs are under-addressed, that assessment improves patient
outcomes, and that some screening for distress and psychosocial assessment tools
have effective psychometric properties that help to “red flag” patients and support
comprehensive assessment. The recommendations in this guideline have been
designed to explain, ignite, and support the need for quality psychosocial health care
needs assessment and screening for distress in persons living with cancer. Using an
evidence base that is grounded in research and clinical practice, they stress the
importance of assessment as a first step in the explication of need and the
implementation of appropriate interventions. At the same time, this document has
suggested a range of important considerations as the field moves forward – from
needs assessment, clinical service provision, resource allocation, intervention, followup,
and outcome evaluation, to related research, and more. We believe the adoption
of these recommendations into cancer practice will bring us one step closer to a
person-focused cancer system that can improve patient and family experience of
living with cancer."
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.