Showing posts with label Canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canada. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
SUSTAINING ACTION TOWARD A SHARED VISION - 2012–2017 Strategic Plan - Partnership Against Cancer Canada (does not include ovarian/gyn)
Blogger's Note: search of 'ovarian'/'ovary'/'gyn' yields null results
SUSTAINING ACTION TOWARD A SHARED VISION - 2012–2017 Strategic Plan - Canada
CONTENTS
2 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR AND CEO
4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. 2012–2017 Strategic Plan
10 THE GROWING CHALLENGE OF CANCER
16 ADVANCING A SHARED VISION
34 2012–2017 STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK
38 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
52 CORE ENABLING FUNCTIONS
2. 2012–2017 Business Plan
64 PLANNING FOR RESULTS
70 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
103 CORE ENABLING FUNCTIONS
3. Moving Forward Together
122 TRANSFORMING CANCER CONTROL
add your opinions
Canada
,
partnership against cancer canada
Monday, May 28, 2012
Bill C-38 protest has 13,000 websites going dark across Canada this June | Canada Politics - media (c-38 bill/Canadian healthcare)
Bill C-38 protest has 13,000 websites going dark across Canada this June | Canada Politics
"When it comes to politics, Canadians are generally an
apathetic bunch. Often, a controversy will brew and within a week or two
we forget about it and move on.
It appears Bill C-38 is one issue we're not willing to let go....Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act
An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures
C-38: What it means for health care (media)
add your opinions
bill C-38
,
Canada
,
canadian politics
,
healthcare canada
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Loud and Clear: seniors and caregivers speak out about navigating Ontario's healthcare system
Change Foundation engaged Ontario seniors.....
Loud and Clear
About Loud and Clear
In Loud and Clear: Seniors and caregivers speak out about navigating Ontario’s healthcare system, we explain our rationale for the timing and target of our engagement, describe our methodology, present our findings and how we plan to use them, and share the Foundation’s next steps and how they fit, feed into, and even blaze the way for patient-centred healthcare in Ontario.Dedication
We dedicate this report to the seniors and their family members and friends across Ontario who shared their experiences and stories with us. They spoke forcefully and thoughtfully, with both emotion and measure, about where the system has failed them and how it could serve them better. They spoke loud and clear.
“I don’t know what’s happening next, but where do you go to
find the answers? Seems like there are roadblocks set up in the system
that make it hard.”
Ontario senior
Ontario senior
“Our doctor sent us for an appointment with a specialist. We
waited five months and never heard anything, so I called and they had no
record of the appointment. It would be a good idea if someone from the
doctor’s office called the patient once an appointment is made to
confirm.”
Ontario senior
Ontario senior
“I’ve never been asked as a caregiver, 'What’s convenient for
you?' Or 'How would this work in your family?' instead it’s 'This is
what we’re going to do for you.' There's no discussion of
collaboration.”
Ontario caregiver
Ontario caregiver
add your opinions
Canada
,
healthcare system
,
Ontario
,
seniors
Monday, May 07, 2012
National Guideline Clearinghouse | Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer - Alberta, Canada
Blogger's Note: note the differences in early stage recommendations per cell type
National Guideline Clearinghouse | Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.
Guideline Title
Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.
Bibliographic Source(s)
Alberta Provincial Gynecologic Oncology Tumour Team. Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Edmonton (Alberta): Alberta Health Services, Cancer Care; 2010 Jul. 19 p. (Clinical practice guideline; no. GYNE-005). [104 references] |
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
-
|
-
|
Scope
Disease/Condition(s)
- Epithelial ovarian cancer
- Fallopian tube cancer
- Primary peritoneal cancer
Guideline Category
Evaluation
Management
Treatment
Clinical Specialty
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Oncology
Radiation Oncology
Surgery
Intended Users
Physician Assistants
Physicians
Guideline Objective(s)
To outline management decisions for women with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer
Key Points
Key Points
- Completely staged, early epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers are highly curable. As such, patients should be referred to a gynecologic oncologist for adequate staging, including sampling of para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes, infracolic omentectomy, possible appendectomy and biopsy of suspicious peritoneal lesions, in addition to a thorough inspection and palpation of all peritoneal surfaces, and peritoneal washings.
- Advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers are best treated with optimal debulking surgery in conjunction with adjuvant therapy. As such, patients should be referred to a gynecologic oncologist
add your opinions
Alberta
,
alberta guidelines
,
alberta guidelines ovarian cancer
,
Canada
,
canadian ovarian guidelines
,
provincial guidelines
Thursday, April 26, 2012
paywalled: Journal of Cancer Education: Knowledge of Reproductive System Cancers, Their Treatments and Side Effects (Canada)
Knowledge of Reproductive System Cancers, Their Treatments and Side Effects
Abstract
We
explored, via an online questionnaire, knowledge of breast and
reproductive system cancers in patients and non-patients
who access the internet for information on these diseases.
We compared that knowledge to the attention the diseases have received
in medical research and on the Internet. Data were collected
from 690 respondents (37 % male, 63 % female) about their knowledge
of prevalence, lethality, treatments and side effects of
testicular, prostate, breast, uterine, cervical and ovarian cancers.
Most males, but only half of the female participants, were
patients themselves. Although participants showed better knowledge
of cancers specific to their own sex, both sexes felt
familiar with breast cancer and less aware of other cancers. Women were
as aware as men of side effects of treatments for male
reproductive cancers. Sex differences in awareness appear to reflect
different attitudes towards illness, bias toward females as
caregivers, and the disproportionate media attention given to
breast cancer.
add your opinions
Canada
,
cancer awareness
Sunday, April 22, 2012
abstract: Curr Oncol. 2012 Apr;19(2):70-7. Accelerating knowledge to action: the pan-Canadian cancer control strategy (including blogger's note)
Blogger's Note/Opinion: this is the medline abstract secondary to the recent posting via Oncology Reports; some points to consider: details of the history past need clarification so as not to presume certain statements; in fact a further ~$250 million was funded by the Canadian government at the 5 year renewal date; note also that the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer existed previously (name change), albeit without the current wider structure
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Accelerating knowledge to action: the pan-Canadia... [Curr Oncol. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI
Abstract
"In 2006, the federal government committed funding of $250 million over 5 years for the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer Corporation to begin implementation of the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control (cscc)...."
"Evaluation findings support the conclusions that Canada has made progress in achieving immediate outcomes (achievable in <5 years) associated with advancing its cancer control goals and that there is evidence that, with sustained effort, those goals will translate into a long-term (>25 years) impact on cancer."
"With the ongoing funding commitment to support coordinated action within a federated environment of health care delivery, there is opportunity to reduce the impact that cancer may have in the long term in Canada...."
add your opinions
Canada
,
canadian partnership against cancer
,
cancer
,
cancer control canada
,
federal government
,
healthcare canada
Friday, April 20, 2012
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Medscape: Oncologists Are Not Health Economists, Suggests Survey (U.S. & Canadian physician survey)
Oncologists Are Not Health Economists, Suggests Survey
"Interestingly, responses to the clinical scenario did not significantly differ between American and Canadian oncologist."
add your opinions
Canada
,
health costs
,
Oncologist
,
survey
,
U.S.
Drug Formulary - Avastin - Cancer Care Ontario (compared to Australia) - see notes
Blogger's Notes:
incidence rates ovarian cancer:
Australia: 1,488 (2015 projection)
Canada: 2,600 (annual estimates)
- Australia population (census) 22 million
- Canada population (census) 34 million
- Ontario population (census) 13 million
Drug Formulary - Ontario
SEARCH - 'avastin' (null results for ovarian cancer)
For Health Professionals | For Patients | ||||||||
Drug Monographs | Chemotherapy Regimens | Medication Information Sheets | Regimen Information Sheets |
To refine your search, use Category Search or Advanced Search
CATEGORY SEARCH
|
ADVANCED SEARCH
|
(CCS) Clinical Trials - Canada: ovarian cancer/Avastin
Recruiting in 1 of 2 locations |
|
Recruiting in 2 of 4 locations |
media: Canadians OK with higher taxes to fight inequality (preserve social programs/health)
Canadians OK with higher taxes to fight inequality
"This attitude toward paying slightly higher taxes is reflected
equally in high-income and middle income Canadian households.
from the newly established think tank, said......
add your opinions
Canada
,
inequality
,
social programs
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
abstract: Harmony in drug regulation, but who's calling the tune? An examination of regulatory harmonization in health Canada [Int J Health Serv. 2012] (eg. safety, influences, industry...)
Blogger's Note: the current federal (conservative) government is known widely for its lack of transparency (past and present), Health Canada, obviously, falls within federal mandates
Harmony in drug regulation, but who's call... [Int J Health Serv. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(1):119-36.
Source
School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada. jlexchin@yorku.caAbstract
Harmonizing standards on drug regulation makes sense, but it must protect safety, ensure that only drugs that are truly effective are marketed, and protect a country's ability to act independently. The main driving force behind international harmonization is the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH). When it comes to safety, the ICH has been harmonizing to the lowest common denominator. Examples of harmonization indicate that industry priorities have influenced the direction that Health Canada has taken. Harmonization is also intimately tied in with the policy of smart regulation, changing regulations in a way that enhances the climate for investment. Canada has introduced user fees in concert with other countries, but there are concerns that these may compromise safety standards. When it comes to transparency, Health Canada has chosen to adopt the more restrictive European Union model rather than the more open process used by the United States. Finally, there are a number of areas in which Health Canada has chosen not to harmonize, and in each case the decision is in the direction of lower safety standards. Harmonization could be of benefit to Canada, but the evidence to date suggests that Health Canada been harmonizing down rather than up.
add your opinions
Canada
,
drug regulations
,
transparency
Evidence-based Guideline Recommendations on the use of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Colorectal Cancer (Ontario provincial Gastrointestinal Disease Site Group)
Blogger's Note: updated to 2010
Evidence-based Guideline Recommendations on the use of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Colorectal Cancer
add your opinions
Canada
,
colorectal cancer screening
,
evidence based recommendations
,
Ontario
,
PET imaging
Saturday, March 24, 2012
abstract: The practice of pathology in Canada: decreasing pathologist supply and uncertain outcomes
The practice of pathology in Canada: dec... [Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012]
Sections of Gynecological and Cytopathology Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
CONTEXT:
Pathology organizations in the United States are preparing for a new era of health care reform. Trends in the supply of pathologists in Canada's managed care system may provide some useful insights in any analysis and projection of future pathologist needs in the United States.OBJECTIVE:
In this study, population-based Canadian databases were used to devise a parameter for physician supply, cancer cases per physician. The trend in this supply parameter for pathologists was compared to that for radiation oncologists.DESIGN:
The number of Canadian pathologists and radiation oncologists and the annual number of new cancer cases in each of 2 years, 1999 and 2009, were extracted from reliable databases. Cancer cases per pathologist and oncologist were calculated, and relative trends in supply of physicians in both specialties were identified.RESULTS:
The annual number of new cancer cases increased from 129,300 to 171,000 from 1999 to 2009. The absolute numbers of both pathologists and oncologists also increased in this time period. However, while the increase in the number of radiation oncologists led to an 8.2% decrease in cancer cases per radiation oncologist, the modest increase in the number of pathologists led to an increase of 17.1% in cancer cases per pathologist.CONCLUSIONS:
There is a trend toward a decreasing supply of Canadian pathologists relative to that of cancer demands. This finding confirms an earlier population-based study showing a decreased supply relative to population and number of clinical physicians. It is uncertain whether this decreased supply is a result of appropriate application of new, efficient methods or whether health care has been rationed or adversely impacted. Outcome measures to monitor Canadian pathology practice quality are clearly needed.
add your opinions
Canada
,
healthcare system
,
pathologists
,
physician comparisons
,
physician supply
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, abstract: Patient perceptions of communications on the threshold of cancer survivorship: implications for provider responses (small study)
Abstract
"......confusion, insecurity, vulnerability, loss, and abandonment....."
Introduction
Although
high quality professional–patient communication is recognized as
fundamental to effective cancer care, less attention
has been paid to developing an evidence basis for
communications surrounding the stage of the cancer journey when primary
cancer treatment concludes, management
responsibilities shift from oncology specialist services into the
generalist care domain,
and the patient transitions beyond patienthood and
into survivorship.
add your opinions
Canada
,
cancer survivorship
,
communication
,
generalist cancer care
,
transitions
abstract: Survival Duration among Patients with a Noncancer Diagnosis Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit: A Retrospective Study
Abstract
Background:
Palliative care unit (PCU) beds are a limited resource in Canada, so PCU admission is restricted to patients with a short prognosis. Anecdotally, PCUs further restrict admission of patients with noncancer diagnoses out of fear that they will "oversurvive" and reduce bed availability. This raises concerns that noncancer patients have unequal access to PCU resources.
Purpose/Methods:
To clarify survival duration of patients with a noncancer diagnosis, we conducted a retrospective review of all admissions to four PCUs in Toronto, Canada, over a 1-year period. We measured associations between demographic data, prognosis, Palliative Performance Score (PPS), length of stay (LOS), and waiting time.
Results:
We collected data for 1000 patients, of whom 21% had noncancer diagnoses. Noncancer patients were older, with shorter prognoses and lower PPS scores on admission. Noncancer patients had shorter LOS (14 versus 24, p<0.001) than cancer patients and a similar likelihood of being discharged alive to cancer patients. Noncancer patients had a trend to lower LOS across a broad range of demographic, diagnostic, prognostic, and PPS categories. Multivariable analysis showed that LOS was not associated with the diagnosis of cancer (p=0.36).
Discussion/Conclusion:
Noncancer patients have a shorter LOS than cancer patients and a similar likelihood of being discharged alive from a PCU than cancer patients, and the diagnosis of cancer did not correlate with survival in our study population. Our findings demonstrate that noncancer patients are not "oversurviving," and that referring physicians and PCUs should not reject or restrict noncancer referrals out of concern that these patients are having a detrimental impact on PCU bed availability.
add your opinions
access
,
Canada
,
non-cancer patients
,
palliative care
,
Toronto
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
press release: Canada, Australia and New Zealand establish a new research partnership - CIHR
Canada, Australia and New Zealand establish a new research partnership - CIHR
Ottawa (March 20, 2012) – The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute (APHCRI) at the Australian National University and the Health Research Council of New Zealand (HRC NZ) are partnering to fund research on innovative models of Community-based Primary Healthcare (CBPHC). As part of CIHR's Signature Initiative, funded teams will examine how to better prevent and manage chronic disease, as well as improve access to care for vulnerable populations.
Recognizing that innovative research in CBPHC is essential to better health outcomes, improved equity, reduced wait times, and an improved patient experience, the partners have agreed to support cross-jurisdictional Canada-Australia and Canada-New Zealand teams of researchers, patients, decision-makers and clinicians.
"This collaborative research between Canada, Australia, and New Zealand will allow our three countries to test different models of primary healthcare", said Dr. Beaudet, President of CIHR.
"The international best practices that emerge will benefit our healthcare systems and, most importantly, contribute to better health outcomes."
...........cont'd
add your opinions
Australia
,
Canada
,
CIHR
,
healthcare systems
,
New Zealand
,
primary care
,
research partnership
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Arch Intern Med -- Abstract: Intensive Care Unit Bed Availability and Outcomes for Hospitalized Patients With Sudden Clinical Deterioration (Calgary, Alberta)
Arch Intern Med -- Abstract: Intensive Care Unit Bed Availability and Outcomes for Hospitalized Patients With Sudden Clinical Deterioration
ONLINE FIRST Intensive Care Unit Bed Availability and Outcomes for Hospitalized Patients With Sudden Clinical Deterioration
Background Intensive care unit (ICU) beds, a scarce resource, may require prioritization of admissions when demand exceeds supply. We evaluated the effect of ICU bed availability on processes and outcomes of care for hospitalized patients with sudden clinical deterioration.
Methods We identified consecutive hospitalized adults in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, with sudden clinical deterioration triggering medical emergency team activation between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2009. We compared ICU admission rates (within 2 hours of medical emergency team activation), patient goals of care (resuscitative, medical, and comfort), and hospital mortality according to the number of ICU beds available (0, 1, 2, or >2), adjusting for patient, physician, and hospital characteristics (using data from clinical and administrative databases).
Results The cohort consisted of 3494 patients. Reduced ICU bed availability was associated with a decreased likelihood of patient admission within 2 hours of medical emergency team activation (P = .03) and with an increased likelihood of change in patient goals of care (P < .01). Patients with sudden clinical deterioration when zero ICU beds were available were 33.0% (95% CI, –5.1% to 57.3%) less likely to be admitted to the ICU and 89.6% (95% CI, 24.9% to 188.0%) more likely to have their goals of care changed compared with when more than 2 ICU beds were available. Hospital mortality did not vary significantly by ICU bed availability (P = .82).
Conclusion Among hospitalized patients with sudden clinical deterioration, we noted a significant association between the number of ICU beds available and ICU admission and patient goals of care but not hospital mortality.
add your opinions
Alberta
,
calgary
,
Canada
,
emergent care
,
hospital systems
,
icu
,
patient care
,
patient goals
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)