|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
Risk communication
Objective
To examine when and why women disbelieve tailored information about their risk of developing breast cancer.
Methods
690
women participated in an online program to learn about medications that
can reduce the risk of breast cancer. The program presented tailored
information about each woman's personal breast cancer risk. Half of
women were told how their risk numbers were calculated, whereas the rest
were not. Later, they were asked whether they believed that the program
was personalized, and whether they believed their risk numbers. If a
woman did not believe her risk numbers, she was asked to explain why.
Results
Beliefs
that the program was personalized were enhanced by explaining the risk
calculation methods in more detail. Nonetheless, nearly 20% of women did
not believe their personalized risk numbers. The most common reason for
rejecting the risk estimate was a belief that it did not fully account
for personal and family history.
Conclusions
The
benefits of tailored risk statistics may be attenuated by a tendency
for people to be skeptical that these risk estimates apply to them
personally.
Practice implications
Decision
aids may provide risk information that is not accepted by patients, but
addressing the patients’ personal circumstances may lead to greater
acceptance.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.