|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
Anti-angiogenic
agents have played crucial roles in the treatment of ovarian cancer in
recent years, but potential benefits of endostatin have been largely
unexplored. The present retrospective study evaluated its efficacy and
toxicity with two cohorts of patients with platinum-resistant recurrent
ovarian cancer. One cohort received gemcitabine plus endostar
(rh-endostatin), and the second cohort received gemcitabine regimen
alone, with totals of 31 and 27 patients, respectively. The main
endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), PFS, overall survival (OS)
and safety. There were statistically significant differences in DCR
(70.9% vs. 40.7%; P = 0.02) and PFS (6.3 months vs. 3.2 months, P =
0.001) between the two cohorts. Though the endostar cohort also improved
median OS by 2.1 months, there was no statistically significant
difference compared with gemcitabine alone cohort in this case (12.5
months vs. 10.4 months, P = 0.201). Treatment was well tolerated for
most patients, and toxicity of endostar was negligible. Gemcitabine plus
endostar significantly improved the prognosis in patients with
platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, especially in those with
malignant effusion. The endostar- containing regimen is recommended in
this setting.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.