Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To
determine response rates (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall
survival (OS), and toxicity in patients treated with cytotoxic
chemotherapy, in combination with bevacizumab compared to cytotoxic
chemotherapy alone, in the setting of recurrent ovarian cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, two cohorts of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer
were identified: 1) patients that received cytotoxic chemotherapy with
bevacizumab from January 2006 to June 2009; 2) patients that received
cytotoxic chemotherapy alone. RR were measured using RECIST criteria or
by CA-125 levels using modified Rustin criteria. RR, OS, and PFS were
determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
RESULTS:
Thirty-two
patients that received bevacizumab in combination with cytotoxic
chemotherapy and 32 patients that received cytotoxic chemotherapy alone
were identified. The control patients were matched for age, platinum
response, histology, surgical outcome, grade, and number of previous
chemotherapy regimens. There were no differences between the two cohorts
in the rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (p = 0.39), bleeding (p =
0.15) or bowel obstruction (p = 0.40). The rate of hypertension in the
bevacizumab cohort was greater than in the comparison cohort (p <
0.005). There were no differences in response rates PR/CR vs SD/PD (p =
0.46), OS (p = 0.79) or PFS (p = 0.43).
CONCLUSIONS:
With
increased toxicity, increased cost of therapy and no improvement in PFS
or OS, the role of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer warrants further investigation.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.