|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
open access (note: 2012 posted as abstract only)
Introduction
In the 2002 World Health Organization (WHO) Blue Book[1]
a wide range of ovarian carcinoma subtypes are described, but the
reality of the era when the book was written was that ovarian carcinoma
was managed as if it were a single disease. Since then, there have been
significant advances in our understanding of the molecular alterations
in ovarian carcinoma, with refinement of the diagnostic criteria for
ovarian carcinoma subtypes, which will be reflected in the forthcoming
update to the WHO classification system. It is no longer appropriate to
consider ovarian carcinoma to be a single disease. While a simplified
classification of ovarian carcinoma into Type I and Type II tumours has
been suggested,[2, 3]
this system perpetuates the earlier error of lumping together unrelated
tumour types (e.g. mucinous and clear cell); this has had the effect of
holding back progress towards subtype specific therapy, and is to be
avoided. Some valid points are made within this classification system,
in that the Type I (low-grade) tumours (including low-grade serous,
low-grade endometrioid, clear cell and mucinous carcinomas) generally
harbour somatic mutations in genes encoding specific protein kinases and
other signalling molecules, creating opportunities for targeted
therapy, while the Type II (high-grade serous) tumours do not have
frequent/recurrent mutations in specific oncogenes. None the less, there
are consistent differences between the tumour subtypes lumped together
as Type I and these subtypes are best considered as specific tumour
types. It is worth noting that high-grade serous carcinomas account for
70% of all ovarian carcinomas and are responsible for 90% of ovarian
cancer deaths[4, 5];
significantly lowering overall morbidity and mortality from ovarian
carcinoma will therefore necessarily have to focus on this subtype.
This
review will discuss recent advances in understanding the molecular
pathology and pathogenesis of ovarian carcinoma, considering each of the
five subtypes. Their respective responses to currently available
treatments will be discussed briefly, along with emerging
subtype-specific therapeutic agents..........
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.