Safety and efficacy of rolapitant for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting after administration of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy or anthracycline and cyclophosphamide regimens in patients with cancer: a randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial - The Lancet Oncology
Background
Chemotherapy-induced nausea
and vomiting is a common side-effect of many antineoplastic regimens and
can occur for several days after treatment. We aimed to assess the
neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist
rolapitant, in combination with a
serotonin (5-HT
3) receptor antagonist and dexamethasone, for
the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients
with cancer after administration of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy
or regimens containing an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.
Methods
We
conducted a
global, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3
study at 170 cancer centres in 23 countries. We included patients with
cancer aged 18 years or older, who had not received moderately or highly
emetogenic chemotherapy before, with a Karnofsky performance score of
60 or higher, and a predicted life expectancy of 4 months or longer. We
used an interactive web-based randomisation system to randomly allocate
patients to receive either oral rolapitant (one 180 mg dose; rolapitant
group) or a placebo that was identical in appearance (active control
group) 1–2 h before administration of moderately emetogenic
chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by sex. All patients also
received granisetron (2 mg orally) and dexamethasone (20 mg orally) on
day 1 (except for patients receiving taxanes as part of moderately
emetogenic chemotherapy, who received dexamethasone according to the
package insert) and granisetron (2 mg orally) on days 2–3. Every cycle
was a minimum of 14 days. In up to five subsequent cycles, patients
received the same study drug they were assigned in cycle 1, unless they
chose to leave the study or were removed at the treating clinician's
discretion. Efficacy analysis was done in the modified
intention-to-treat population (comprising all patients who received at
least one dose of study drug at a study site compliant with Good
Clinical Practice [GCP]). The primary endpoint was the proportion of
patients achieving a complete response (defined as no emesis or use of
rescue medication) in the delayed phase (>24–120 h after initiation
of chemotherapy) in cycle 1. This study is registered with
ClinicalTrials.gov, number
NCT01500226. The study has been completed.
Findings
Between
March 5, 2012, and Sept 6, 2013, 1369 patients were randomised to
receive either rolapitant (n=684) or active control (n=685). 666
patients in each group received at least one dose of study drug at a
GCP-compliant site and were included in the modified intention-to-treat
population. A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving
rolapitant had complete responses in the delayed phase than did those
receiving active control (475 [71%]
vs 410 [62%]; odds ratio
1·6, 95% CI 1·2–2·0; p=0·0002). The incidence of adverse events was
similar in the rolapitant and control groups, with the most frequently
reported treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events being
fatigue, constipation, and headache. For cycle 1, the most common grade
3–4 adverse event in the rolapitant versus active control groups was
neutropenia (32 [5%]
vs 23 [3%] patients). No serious adverse
event was treatment-related, and no treatment-related treatment-emergent
adverse event resulted in death.
Interpretation
Rolapitant in combination with a 5-HT
3
receptor antagonist and dexamethasone is well tolerated and shows
superiority over active control for the prevention of
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during the 5-day (0–120 h)
at-risk period after administration of moderately emetogenic
chemotherapy or regimens containing an anthracycline and
cyclophosphamide.
Funding
TESARO, Inc.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.