|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
abstract
Highlights
- •
- Physicians are reluctant in prescribing HRT in gynaecological cancer survivors because of the fear that hormones may influence the risk of recurrence.
- •
- No evidence of increased risk in the available studies on HRT in survivors of endometrial, ovarian and squamous cervical cancer, even if no definitive results have been formulated
- •
- The positive effect of HRT on the quality of life seems to outweigh the unfounded suspicion about an increased risk of recurrence
- •
- It is mandatory to inform patients about alternative therapies other than estrogens, in particular for prevention of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease.
Different
treatments (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) for gynaecological
cancers may cause ovarian failure or increase menopausal symptoms. There
is a widespread reluctance among physicians to prescribe hormone
replacement therapy (HRT) to the survivors of gynaecological cancer.
This review analyses the use of HRT and of alternative therapies in such
women. Squamous cervical cancer is not estrogen dependent and thus HRT
is not contraindicated. While a cautious approach to hormone-dependent
cancer is warranted, for women treated for non-hormone-related tumours
alternative treatments for menopausal symptoms should be given due
consideration, as any reluctance to prescribe HRT for them has neither a
biological nor a clinical basis. In studies of HRT for survivors of
endometrial and ovarian cancer, for instance, no evidence of increased
risk was found, although no definitive conclusions can yet be
formulated. The positive effect of HRT on quality of life seems to
outweigh the unfounded suspicion of an increased risk of recurrence of
non-hormone-related tumours. Effective non-hormonal alternatives for
vasomotor symptoms are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and
selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.