|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
open access
Protocol
Full predicted energy from nutrition and the effect on mortality and infectious complications in critically ill adults: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of parallel randomised controlled trials
Background
Nutrition
is vital to survival in health. In critical illness, however, the role
of nutrition is less defined. More specifically, the exact amount of
energy that is required during critical illness to optimally influence
clinical outcomes remains unknown. Prolonged provision of nutrition
below a patient’s individual nutrition requirements (including under
provision of energy, specifically) can result in malnutrition. Whist the
prevalence of malnutrition in critically ill patients is generally
poorly documented, poorly defined, and varies depending on the criteria
used, reports indicate that worldwide prevalence in hospitalised
patients is between 20 and 50 % internationally [1].
Malnutrition is thus likely to be commonplace in critically ill
patients. In the acute hospitalised population, malnutrition has been
associated with many undesirable clinical consequences such as reduced
immune function, increased length of hospital stay, impaired wound
healing, muscle wasting and ultimately increased health care costs [1].
Conversely, it is known that excessive nutrition can lead to over
provision of energy and result in adverse patient effects including
increased metabolic stress, hyperglycaemia and deranged liver function [2].
Despite
the known consequences of significant under- or overfeeding in
critically ill patients, there is considerable uncertainty.....Expected benefits of this review
This
will be the first published systematic review and meta-analysis to our
knowledge that will investigate the effect of delivering full predicted
energy from nutrition on clinical outcomes in critically ill adults,
compared to delivering less than full predicted energy requirements. The
literature available on this topic is conflicting and confusing for
clinicians and could potentially lead to misleading conclusions being
made regarding the role of nutrition in critical illness. This
systematic review and meta-analysis will benefit clinicians by providing
a summary of the available literature and provide further guidance.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.