|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blogger's note: this paper does not deal with genetics, note also that MRI is useful in UTUC
open access
Abstract
Intravenous
urography has been widely used for the evaluation of upper tract
urothelial carcinoma. However, computed tomography urography presently
has a higher diagnostic accuracy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
(94.2–99.6%) than intravenous urography (80.8–84.9%), and has replaced
intravenous urography as the first-line imaging test for investigating
patients with a high risk of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Although
the detection rate for bladder tumors using standard computed tomography
urography is not yet high enough to replace cystoscopy, the addition of
a 60- to 80-s delayed scan after the administration of contrast
material for the whole pelvis improves the detection rate. A drawback to
computed tomography urography is the higher radiation dose of
15–35 mSv, compared with a mean effective dose of 5–10 mSv for
intravenous urography. Among several approaches to reducing the
radiation dose, the use of an iterative reconstruction algorithm is most
likely to become an effective solution because of its simplicity. One
advantage of computed tomography urography over intravenous urography is
its ability to reliably differentiate between upper tract urothelial
carcinoma and calculi or blood clots. Computed tomography urography also
shows characteristic findings of other benign conditions. These
findings, in combination with negative cytology, are very important
diagnostic clues for avoiding an unnecessary nephroureterectomy. For the
clinical staging, a recent study has reported the high diagnostic
accuracy of computed tomography urography with respect to ≥pT3 tumors.
The present review shows the current status of computed tomography
urography for the evaluation of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Introduction
Tumors
of the renal pelvis and ureter are rare, and account for just 8% of all
urinary tract neoplasms; of these, more than 90% are urothelial
carcinomas.[1] The incidence of these tumors is 0.7–1.1 per 100 000, and has increased slightly.[1]
Recently, several advances have been made in the treatment of UTUC.
Developments in endoscopic management have enabled less invasive therapy
for small, low-grade, Ta or T1 UTUC,[2, 3]
whereas neoadjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node dissection have
improved the prognostic outcomes for muscle-invasive or locally advanced
UTUC.[4-8]
These developments have, more than ever, emphasized the importance of
earlier detection and accurate UTUC staging using imaging modalities.
Furthermore, considering that 8.5–13% of patients with UTUC have
synchronous bladder cancer and 15–50% of patients with UTUC will develop
bladder cancer, the need for non-invasive bladder surveillance at the
initial examination or at follow-up examinations of these patients
should be underscored.[9].....
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.