|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
A splicing variant of TERT identified by GWAS interacts with menopausal estrogen therapy in risk of ovarian cancer
Menopausal
estrogen-alone therapy (ET) is a well-established risk factor for serous
and endometrioid ovarian cancer. Genetics also plays a role in ovarian
cancer, which is partly attributable to 18 confirmed ovarian cancer
susceptibility loci identified by genome-wide association studies. The
interplay among these loci, ET use, and ovarian cancer risk has yet to
be evaluated. We analyzed data from 1,414 serous cases, 337 endometrioid
cases, and 4,051 controls across 10 case-control studies participating
in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Conditional
logistic regression was used to determine the association between the
confirmed susceptibility variants and risk of serous and endometrioid
ovarian cancer among ET users and non-users separately and to test for
statistical interaction. A splicing variant in TERT, rs10069690, showed a statistically significant interaction with ET use for risk of serous ovarian cancer (pint=0.013).
ET users carrying the T allele had a 51% increased risk of disease
(OR=1.51, 95% CI 1.19-1.91), which was stronger for long-term ET users
of 10+ years (OR=1.85, 95% CI 1.28-2.66, pint=0.034).
Non-users showed essentially no association (OR=1.08, 95% CI 0.96-1.21).
Two additional genomic regions harboring rs7207826 (C allele) and
rs56318008 (T allele) also had significant interactions with ET use for
the endometrioid histotype (pint=0.021 and pint=0.037,
respectively).
Hence, a total of three confirmed susceptibility variants were identified whose associations with ovarian cancer risk are modified by ET exposure; follow-up is warranted given that these interactions are not adjusted for multiple comparisons. These findings, if validated, may elucidate the mechanism of action of these loci.
Hence, a total of three confirmed susceptibility variants were identified whose associations with ovarian cancer risk are modified by ET exposure; follow-up is warranted given that these interactions are not adjusted for multiple comparisons. These findings, if validated, may elucidate the mechanism of action of these loci.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.