paywalled: Original Article Use of FDG PET/CT for investigation of febrile neutropenia: evaluation in high-risk cancer patients

Use of FDG PET/CT for investigation of febrile neutropenia: evaluation in high-risk cancer patients

Purpose  

Febrile neutropenia (FNP) is a frequent complication of cancer care and evaluation often fails to identify a cause. [¹⁸  F]FDG PET/CT has the potential to identify inflammatory and infectious foci, but its potential role as an investigation for persistent FNP has not previously been explored. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical utility of FDG PET/CT in patients with cancer and severe neutropenia and five or more days of persistent fever despite antibiotic therapy.

Conclusion  

This study supports the utility of FDG PET/CT scanning in severely neutropenic patients with five or more days of fever. Further evaluation of the contribution of FDG PET/CT in the management of FNP across a range of underlying malignancies is required.

paywalled: Computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis

Computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis

Abstract 

Objectives

To compare the diagnostic performances of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and positron emission tomography (PET or PET/CT) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with ovarian cancer.

Methods

Relevant studies were identified with MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1990 to July 2010. We estimated the weighted summary sensitivities, specificities, OR (odds ratio), and summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves of each imaging technique and conducted pair-wise comparisons using the two-sample Z-test. Meta-regression, subgroup analysis, and funnel plots were also performed to explain the between-study heterogeneity.

Results

Eighteen eligible studies were included, with a total of 882 patients. PET or PET/CT was a more accurate modality (sensitivity, 73.2%; specificity, 96.7%; OR [odds ratio], 90.32). No significant difference was detected between CT (sensitivity, 42.6%; specificity, 95.0%; OR, 19.87) and MR imaging (sensitivity, 54.7%; specificity, 88.3%; OR, 12.38). Meta-regression analyses and subgroup analyses revealed no statistical difference. Funnel plots with marked asymmetry suggested a publication bias.

Conclusion

FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT is more accurate than CT and MR imaging in the detection of lymph node metastasis in patients with ovarian cancer.

Defining the Role of PET-CT in Staging Early Breast Cancer

Defining the Role of PET-CT in Staging Early Breast Cancer:

 Abstract
Introduction. Currently, there is a lack of data on the role of combined positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET–CT) in the staging of early invasive primary breast cancer. We therefore evaluated the role of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG)-PET–CT in this patient population.
Methods. We prospectively recruited 70 consecutive patients (69 women, one man; mean age, 61.9 ± 8.1 years) with early primary breast cancer for staging with ¹⁸F-FDG-PET–CT. All PET–CT images were interpreted by two readers (independently of each other). A third reader adjudicated any discrepancies. All readers had ≥5 years of specific experience. Ethics board approval and informed consent were obtained.
Results. The mean clinical follow-up was 22.7 ± 12.6 months. The primary tumor was identified with PET–CT in 64 of 70 patients. Of the unidentified lesions, surgical pathology revealed two intraductal carcinomas, one invasive tubular carcinoma, and three invasive lobular carcinomas. Undiagnosed multifocal breast disease was shown in seven of 70 patients. PET–CT identified avid axillary lymph nodes in 19 of 70 patients, compared with 24 of 70 confirmed during surgery. There were four patients who were axillary node positive on PET but had no axillary disease at surgery.
Five patients were reported with avid metastases. Two of those patients were treated for metastatic disease (nodal, lung, and liver in one and bone metastases in the other) following further imaging and clinical assessment. In the other three patients, lesions (lung, n = 1; pleural, n = 1; paratrachael node, n = 1) were subsequently diagnosed as benign lesions.
Conclusion. Integrated ¹⁸F-FDG-PET–CT may have a role in staging patients presenting with early breast cancer.

paywalled: PET/CT scanning guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

PET/CT scanning guided intensity-modulated radi... [Eur J Radiol. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical contribution of positron emission tomography using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose and integrated computer tomography (FDG-PET/CT) guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Fifty-eight patients with recurrent ovarian cancer from 2003 to 2008 were retrospectively studied. In these patients, 28 received PET/CT guided IMRT (PET/CT-IMRT group), and 30 received CT guided IMRT (CT-IMRT group). Treatment plans, tumor response, toxicities and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Changes in GTV delineation were found in 10 (35.7%) patients based on PET-CT information compared with CT data, due to the incorporation of additional lymph node metastases and extension of the metastasis tumor. PET/CT guided IMRT improved tumor response compared to CT-IMRT group (CR: 64.3% vs. 46.7%, P=0.021; PR: 25.0% vs. 13.3%, P=0.036). The 3-year overall survival was significantly higher in the PET-CT/IMRT group than control (34.1% vs. 13.2%, P=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS:

PET/CT guided IMRT in recurrent ovarian cancer patients improved the delineation of GTV and reduce the likelihood of geographic misses and therefore improve the clinical outcome.

paywalled: Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT scans for diagnosing ovarian cancer recurrence

Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contr... [Eur J Radiol. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

 Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate low-dose non-enhanced CT (ldCT) and full-dose contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) in integrated (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT studies for restaging of ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

One hundred and twenty women who had undergone treatment for ovarian cancer underwent a conventional PET/CT scans with ldCT, and then ceCT. Two observers interpreted and decided in consensus on the PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT images by a 3-point scale (N: negative, E: equivocal, P: positive) per patient and lesion site. Final diagnoses were obtained by histopathological examinations, or clinical follow-up for at least 6 months.

RESULTS:

Patient-based analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/ceCT was 86.9% (40/46), 95.9% (71/74), and 92.5% (111/120), respectively, whereas those of PET/ldCT were 78.3% (36/46), 95.0% (70/74), and 88.3% (106/120), respectively. All sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy significantly differed between two methods ...... The scales of detecting 104 recurrent lesion sites were N:14, E:6, P:84 for PET/ceCT, and N:15, E:17, P:72 for PET/ldCT, respectively. Eleven equivocal and one negative regions by PET/ldCT were correctly interpreted as positive by PET/ceCT.

CONCLUSION:

PET/ceCT is a more accurate imaging modality with higher confidence for assessing ovarian cancer recurrence than PET/ldCT.

PET/CT scanning guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

PET/CT scanning guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

PET/CT scanning guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical contribution of positron emission tomography using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose and integrated computer tomography (FDG-PET/CT) guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with recurrent ovarian cancer from 2003 to 2008 were retrospectively studied. In these patients, 28 received PET/CT guided IMRT (PET/CT-IMRT group), and 30 received CT guided IMRT (CT-IMRT group). Treatment plans, tumor response, toxicities and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS: Changes in GTV delineation were found in 10 (35.7%) patients based on PET-CT information compared with CT data, due to the incorporation of additional lymph node metastases and extension of the metastasis tumor. PET/CT guided IMRT improved tumor response compared to CT-IMRT group (CR: 64.3% vs. 46.7%, P=0.021; PR: 25.0% vs. 13.3%, P=0.036). The 3-year overall survival was significantly higher in the PET-CT/IMRT group than control (34.1% vs. 13.2%, P=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT guided IMRT in recurrent ovarian cancer patients improved the delineation of GTV and reduce the likelihood of geographic misses and therefore improve the clinical outcome.

abstract: Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer (including ovarian cancer primary/metastases)

Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of preoperative positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) in the initial staging of patients with early-stage breast cancer. 

Patients and methods: A total of 103 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed operable breast cancer with tumors ≥2 cm were independently examined preoperatively with conventional assessment (mammography, breast/axillary ultrasound, chest X-ray and blood samples) and PET/CT with no prior knowledge of the other. 

Results: PET/CT identified a primary tumor in all but three patients (97%). PET/CT solely detected distant metastases (ovary, bones and lung) in 6 patients and new primary cancers (ovary, lung) in another two patients, as well as 12 cases of extra-axillary lymph node involvement. In 15 patients (15%), extra-axillary malignancy was detected by PET/CT only, leading to an upgrade of initial staging in 14% (14/103) and ultimately a modification of planned treatment in 8% (8/103) of patients. 

Conclusions: PET/CT is a valuable tool to provide information on extra-axillary lymph node involvement, distant metastases and other occult primary cancers. Preoperative ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose–PET/CT has a substantial impact on initial staging and on clinical management in patients with early-stage breast cancer with tumors ≥2 cm.

JCO Editorial (re: Ontario/Pritchard et al) [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography in Breast Cancer: When… and When Not?

[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography in Breast Cancer: When… and When Not?

"....It has taken a relatively long time to generate the data needed to guide appropriate use of FDG PET/CT for breast cancer for all phases of the disease. The task is still not quite complete but is propelled by studies such as Pritchard et al.⁶ We hope that the approach for directing new imaging procedures into clinical practice will continue to improve and be ready when the next imaging breakthrough emerges."

"Diagnostic imaging plays an important role in the care of patients with breast cancer and is used for breast cancer detection, diagnosis, staging, and therapeutic response evaluation.¹ Advances in imaging technology, especially relatively newer technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography without or with integrated computed tomography (PET or PET/CT) provide powerful diagnostic tools, but also generate questions and controversy regarding where and when to use these new modalities. Early studies of new imaging approaches most often come from centers that are scientifically invested in the development of the technology. Typically, small and highly selected patient populations are evaluated, and these preliminary studies often indicate excellent diagnostic performance. Later on, when large multicenter trials are performed with more clinically representative patient populations, the new test invariably performs less well. Nevertheless, the excitement surrounding early results from a new imaging technology and the increasing public access to these early results fuel the desire by patients for access to new forms of diagnostic imaging. Physicians and patients share the wish for diagnostic certainty in excluding cancer spread at the time of diagnosis and may reason that a purely diagnostic procedure, even if untested, can do no harm. These factors, combined with the challenge and expense of carrying out larger scale diagnostic imaging trials, can lead to the early adoption of new imaging studies into clinical practice, often before their performance and optimal use have been fully determined. However, ......."

open access: Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on 18F-PET/CT in oncologic imaging

fulltext.pdf (application/pdf Object)

abstract: Preoperative assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: intraindividual comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI

Preoperative assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: intraindividual comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI:

Conclusion  

With high diagnostic accuracy for PC of both, MRI and PET/CT, PET/CT provides better diagnostic accuracy and especially better NPV.

open access: Evidenced based indications for the use of PET/CT in the United Kingdom 2012 (includes ovarian/gyn/cancers)

BFCR(12)3_PETCT.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Diagnostic value of PET/CT is similar to that of conventional MRI and even better for detecting small peritoneal implants in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSION:

The present study revealed that PET/CT is similar to conventional MRI for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer. PET/CT has greater accuracy in the detection of small-to-medium-sized (<2 cm) peritoneal implants compared with MRI. This may affect surgical decision making.

open access: MRI, CT, and PET/CT for Ovarian Cancer Detection and Adnexal Lesion Characterization February 2010

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to describe the role of MR, CT, and PET/CT in the detection of ovarian cancer and the evaluation of adnexal lesions.

abstract: Early Detection of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer in Patients with Low-Level Increases in Serum CA-125 Levels by PET/CT

Abstract

Purpose: Serum CA-125 has been shown to be a sensitive tumor marker of recurrent ovarian cancer. The goal of this study was to evaluate the use of 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the early detection of recurrent ovarian cancer in patients with low-level increases in serum CA-125 levels.

abstract: Value of FDG PET/CT in Patients with Treated Ovarian Cancer and Raised CA125 Serum Levels

CONCLUSION:
PET/CT was able to detect active disease at relatively low levels of CA125, thereby facilitating the early diagnosis of recurrence or residual disease. Also in patients with low CA125 levels (<30).

[18F]FDG-PET/CT monitoring early identifies advanced ovarian cancer patients who will benefit from prolonged neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Abstract

AIM: The most accepted standard duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (na-CHT) before debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) is 3 courses. However a percentage of patients could benefit from additional courses......

abstract: FDG-PET/CT in advanced ovarian cancer staging: Value and pitfalls in detecting lesions in different abdominal and pelvic quadrants compared with laparoscopy

CONCLUSION:

Our results suggest that PET/CT may prove a useful tool for pre-surgical staging of ovarian cancer with a sensitivity and specificity of 78 and 68%, respectively. However, it may be used in combination with laparoscopy for better results. PET/CT showed an adequate correlation between SUVmax values and laparoscopy findings of lesions >5mm, but a high rate of false negative results in lesions <5mm such as in carcinomatosis. PET/CT should be used carefully in early stage disease, with low risk of peritoneal infiltration, because of high rate of false positive results, to avoid unnecessary therapy procedures.

Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:
Both integrated FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced multidetector CT are sensitive surveillance modalities for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer; the use of both modalities aids decisions on treatment plans and may ultimately have a favorable impact on prognosis. However, contrast-enhanced multidetector CT is recommended for the regular follow-up for ovarian cancer patients after initial treatment.