Original Article
A prospective study of bowel preparation for colonoscopy with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution versus sodium phosphate in Lynch syndrome: a randomized trial
Lynch gene carriers undergo regular surveillance colonoscopies.
Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG) is routinely prescribed for bowel cleansing, but often poorly tolerated by patients. Sodium phosphate (NaP) may be an alternative. (note warnings published within the past several years on sodium phosphate) Prospective and random comparison of bowel preparation with PEG and NaP on colon cleansing and patients’ acceptance.
Patients, who previously underwent a colonoscopy, were invited to participate and randomly assigned to either PEG or NaP. They were asked to fill in a questionnaire about preparation tolerability and future preferences. The endoscopist filled out a report about the quality of colon cleansing. 125 Patients were included in the study. Nine (7%) were excluded because of missing data. The remaining 116 patients (53 PEG and 63 NaP) were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. Before colonoscopy 20 (38%) patients using PEG experienced the preparation almost intolerable, in contrast to 7(11%) of those using NaP (P = 0.001). Eleven patients in the PEG group and 48 in the NaP group would prefer NaP in the future.
The colonoscopy was poorly tolerated in 17% of the individuals in both groups (P = 0.963). The endoscopist observed a more than 75% clean colon in 83% of patients on PEG and in 71% of patients on NaP (P = 0.076), however the coecum (P = 0.025) and ascending colon was cleaner after PEG.
Lynch patients tolerated NaP better and preferred this formula for future bowel preparation. Colon cleansing was suboptimal with both treatments with a tendency towards a cleaner proximal colon with PEG.
Download PDF (225.4 KB)
Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG) is routinely prescribed for bowel cleansing, but often poorly tolerated by patients. Sodium phosphate (NaP) may be an alternative. (note warnings published within the past several years on sodium phosphate) Prospective and random comparison of bowel preparation with PEG and NaP on colon cleansing and patients’ acceptance.
Patients, who previously underwent a colonoscopy, were invited to participate and randomly assigned to either PEG or NaP. They were asked to fill in a questionnaire about preparation tolerability and future preferences. The endoscopist filled out a report about the quality of colon cleansing. 125 Patients were included in the study. Nine (7%) were excluded because of missing data. The remaining 116 patients (53 PEG and 63 NaP) were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. Before colonoscopy 20 (38%) patients using PEG experienced the preparation almost intolerable, in contrast to 7(11%) of those using NaP (P = 0.001). Eleven patients in the PEG group and 48 in the NaP group would prefer NaP in the future.
The colonoscopy was poorly tolerated in 17% of the individuals in both groups (P = 0.963). The endoscopist observed a more than 75% clean colon in 83% of patients on PEG and in 71% of patients on NaP (P = 0.076), however the coecum (P = 0.025) and ascending colon was cleaner after PEG.
Lynch patients tolerated NaP better and preferred this formula for future bowel preparation. Colon cleansing was suboptimal with both treatments with a tendency towards a cleaner proximal colon with PEG.
Download PDF (225.4 KB)
Keywords Lynch syndrome – Colonoscopy – Polyethylene glycol – Sodium phosphate
