PLoS ONE: Citizen Participation in Patient Prioritization Policy Decisions: An Empirical and Experimental Study on Patients' Characteristics

PLoS ONE: Citizen Participation in Patient Prioritization Policy Decisions: An Empirical and Experimental Study on Patients' Characteristics

"The results of the survey questions showed that the vast majority of respondents agreed to prioritize patients with life threatening diseases and patients with acute diseases over all other patients. All criteria that described the patient's social engagement outside the family or socio-economic status (e.g., income, unemployment) were rejected as possible criteria for prioritization. A similar pattern could be observed in the discrete choice experiment: health status received the highest importance weight, whereas socio-economic status received a very low weight in terms of deciding which patient should be treated first. There is considerable agreement that those in need, i.e., the severely ill patient, should be treated first [1], [5]–[7]. Socio-economic status was not considered acceptable, but is a commonly practiced criterion in the daily routine of physicians [40], if not explicitly, at least implicitly so [41], [42]."


"In particular, medical criteria are highly accepted for prioritizing patients whereas socio-economic criteria and lifestyles are rejected. Especially the DCE showed that health status and quality of life were the only attributes that respondents would ultimately likely include in a decision-making process about which patients to prioritize for care. Policy makers in Germany have been very reluctant to even discuss the topic; indeed, all ministers of health over the last decade or so have refused to even talk about this issue. The present study shows that the “voice of the patient” – reliably captured through the methods used here – can be encapsulated in statistical models and thus introduced into policy-making settings [15]. The methods and findings illustrated in this research can be used to 1) increase citizen participation in the political discussion concerning this substantive policy topic, 2) define the scope of policy actions within the realm of the feasible, and 3) frame communications between policy-setting bodies and the population."

Expanding the Criteria for BRCA Mutation Testing in Breast Cancer Survivors — JCO abstract (joint Canada/U.S. paper)

Purpose Every year approximately 25% of women diagnosed with breast cancer are younger than 50 years of age, and almost 10% of them have a BRCA mutation. Not all potential carriers are identified by existing criteria for BRCA testing. We estimated the costs and benefits of different BRCA testing criteria for women with breast cancer younger than 50 years.

Conclusion Testing women with TN breast cancers who were younger than 50 years for BRCA mutations is a cost-effective strategy and should be adopted into current guidelines for genetic testing.

abstract: (repost) Differences in tumor type in low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcinomas

Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010
Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Huntsman DG, Santos JL, Swenerton KD, Seidman JD, Gilks CB; Cheryl Brown (ovarian cancer survivour/deceased) Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Unit of the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver BC.
Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada T2N 2T9. martin.kobel@cls.ab.ca


Abstract

Although there are recognized differences in the type of ovarian carcinomas between those tumors diagnosed at low versus high stage, there is a lack of data on stage distribution of ovarian carcinomas diagnosed according to the current histopathologic criteria from large population-based cohorts. We reviewed full slide sets of 1009 cases of 2555 patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinoma that were referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency over a 16-year period (1984 to 2000).
On the basis of the reviewed cases we extrapolated the distribution of tumor type in low-stage (I/II) and high-stage (III/IV) tumors. We then compared the frequencies with those seen in a large hospital practice.
The overall frequency of tumor types was as follows: high-grade serous-68.1%, clear-cell-12.2%, endometrioid-11.3%, mucinous-3.4%, low-grade serous-3.4%, rare types-1.6%. High-grade serous carcinomas accounted for 35.5% of stage I/II tumors and 87.7% of stage III/IV tumors.
In contrast, clear-cell (26.2% vs. 4.5%), endometrioid (26.6% vs. 2.5%), and mucinous (7.5% vs. 1.2%) carcinomas were relatively more common among the low-stage versus high-stage tumors.
This distribution was found to be very similar in 410 consecutive cases from the Washington Hospital Center. The distribution of ovarian carcinoma types differs significantly in patients with low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcinoma when contemporary diagnostic criteria are used, with consistent results seen in 2 independent case series. These findings reflect important biological differences in the behavior of the major tumor types, with important clinical implications.

Health Professionals Believe There Is Inadequate Criteria For Certifying That An Illness Is Terminal

abstract/free full access: Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers -- Sjursen et al. -- Journal of Medical Genetics

Conclusion:
Amsterdam criteria and each of the Bethesda criteria were inadequate for identifying MSH6 mutation-carrying kindreds. MSH6 mutations may be more common than currently assumed, and the penetrance/expression of MSH6 mutations, as derived from families meeting current clinical criteria, may be misleading. To increase detection rate of MMR mutation carriers, all cancers in the Lynch syndrome tumour spectrum should be subjected to immunohistochemical analysis and/or analysis for microsatellite instability.

Expert Reviews full access: On the advent of MSI testing of all colorectal cancers and a substantial part of other Lynch syndrome-related neoplasms

Worldwide, more than 1 million people present with colorectal cancer (CRC) annually. Of these, 2–5% occur in the context of Lynch syndrome (LS), the most common hereditary CRC predisposing syndrome (formerly designated as hereditary nonpolyposis CRC [HNPCC]). LS is characterized by a high lifetime risk for the development of CRC (20–70%), endometrial cancer (15–70%) and other extracolonic cancers (<15%). These extracolonic malignancies include carcinomas of the small intestine, stomach, pancreas and biliary tract, ovarium, brain, upper urinary tract and skin. .......germline mutation in one of the MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2.

Owing to the MMR deficiency in LS tumors, a microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype is present. MSI, however, is also found in approximately 10–13% of sporadic CRCs (in total, MSI is present in approximately 15% of all CRCs). In addition to MSI, most LS tumors lack expression in the tumor cell nuclei of one of the four MMR proteins, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2.

Early detection of LS is of great importance, particularly in presymptomatic mutation carriers, since colonoscopic surveillance has proven to reduce CRC morbidity and mortality by 65–70% [6] and prophylactic surgery may prevent endometrial and ovarium carcinoma effectively.

Different models and strategies have been developed to identify patients with LS. In 1990, the Amsterdam criteria I were developed to provide a basis for uniformity in collaborative studies to find the disease-causing gene. These criteria were designed to be highly specific at the expense of sensitivity. They were criticized because extra-colonic tumors were not taken into account, thereby excluding classical LS families....Therefore, the Amsterdam criteria II were established in 1999"