paywalled: Gynecologic Oncology Impact of Complete Cytoreduction Leaving No Gross Residual Disease Associated with Radical Cytoreductive Surgical Procedures on Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Impact of Complete Cytoreduction Leaving No Gross Residual Disease Associated with Radical Cytoreductive Surgical Procedures on Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

 Abstract

Background  

To analyze the impact of radical cytoreductive surgery—as part of primary tumor debulking—on the amount of residual tumor and survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and to evaluate the prognostic significance of no gross residual disease (RD) after surgery.

Methods  

Medical records of 203 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC–IV ovarian cancer were reviewed. All patients underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapy. Various clinicopathologic characteristics were collected.

Results  

Of 203 patients, 119 patients underwent simple surgery, while radical surgery was performed in 84 patients..........

Conclusions  

No gross RD is associated with improved overall survival, and radical surgery was effective for achieving no gross RD.

 

paywalled - Outcomes of Primary Surgical Cytoreduction in Patients with BRCA-associated High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

 Outcomes of Primary Surgical Cytoreduction in Patients with BRCA-associated High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

Objective

BRCA-associated and sporadic ovarian cancers have different pathologic and clinical features. Our goal was to determine if BRCA mutation status is an independent predictor of residual tumor volume following primary surgical cytoreduction.

Highlights

► Differences in the biology of BRCA-associated and sporadic ovarian cancers do not result in differences in primary surgical outcomes.
► The improved survival of BRCA-associated ovarian cancers is not confounded by differences in primary surgical outcome.

Cochrane Review: Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer (abstract)

Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer [Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012]

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;3:CD004706.

Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Epithelial ovarian cancer is diagnosed in 4500 women in the UK each year of whom 1700 will ultimately die of their disease.Of all cases 10% to 15% are diagnosed early when there is still a good possibility of cure. The treatment of early stage disease involves surgery to remove disease often followed by chemotherapy. The largest clinical trials of this adjuvant therapy show an overall survival (OS) advantage with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy but the precise role of this treatment in subgroups of women with differing prognoses needs to be defined.

OBJECTIVES:

To systematically review the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage epithelial ovarian cancer to determine firstly whether there is a survival advantage of this treatment over the policy of observation following surgery with chemotherapy reserved for treatment of disease recurrence, and secondly to determine if clinical subgroups of differing prognosis based on histological sub-type, or completeness of surgical staging, have more or less to gain from chemotherapy following initial surgery.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

We selected randomised clinical trials that met the inclusion criteria set out based on the populations, interventions, comparisons and outcome measures.

MAIN RESULTS:

Five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), enrolling 1277 women, with a median follow-up of 46 to 121 months, met the inclusion criteria. Four trials were included in the meta-analyses and we considered them to be at a low risk of bias. Meta-analysis of five-year data from three trials indicated that women who received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy had better overall survival (OS) than those who did not (1008 women; hazard ratio (HR) 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.93). Likewise, meta-analysis of five-year data from four trials indicated that women who received adjuvant chemotherapy had better progression-free survival (PFS) than those who did not (1170 women; HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.84). The trials included in these meta-analyses gave consistent estimates of the effects of chemotherapy. In addition, these findings were robust over time (10-year PFS: two trials, 925 women; HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.84).
Subgroup analysis suggested that women who had optimal surgical staging of their disease were unlikely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (HR for OS 1.22; 95% CI 0.63 to 2.37; two trials, 234 women) whereas those who had sub-optimal staging did (HR for OS 0.63; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.85; two trials, 772 women). One trial showed a benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy among women at high risk (HR for OS 0.48; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.72) but not among those at low/medium risk (HR for OS 0.95; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.66).
However, these subgroup findings could be due to chance and should be interpreted with caution.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:

Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is effective in prolonging the survival of the majority of patients who are assessed as having early (FIGO stage I/IIa) epithelial ovarian cancer. However, it may be withheld from women in whom there is well-differentiated encapsulated unilateral disease (stage 1a grade 1) or those with comprehensively staged Ib, well or moderately differentiated (grade 1/2) disease. Others with unstaged early disease or those with poorly differentiated tumours should be offered chemotherapy.

A pragmatic approach may be necessary in clinical settings where optimal staging is not normally performed/achieved. In such settings, adjuvant chemotherapy may be withheld from those with encapsulated stage Ia grade 1 serous and endometrioid carcinoma and offered to all others with early stage disease.

abstract: Changes in serum CA-125 can predict optimal cytoreduction to no gross residual disease in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Objective

To evaluate the predictive power of serum CA-125 changes in the management of patients under going neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) for a new diagnosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC).

Methods

Using the Cancer Registry databases from our institutions, a retrospective review of patients with FIGO stage IIIC and IV EOC who were treated with platinum-based NACT-IDS between January 2006 and December 2009 was conducted. Demographic data, CA-125 levels, radiographic data, chemotherapy, and surgical-pathologic information were obtained.

Results

One hundred-three patients with stage IIIC or IV EOC met study criteria. Median number of neoadjuvant cycles was 3. Ninety-nine patients (96.1%) were optimally cytoreduced. Forty-seven patients (47.5%) had resection to no residual disease (NRD). The median CA-125 at diagnosis and before interval debulking was 1749 U/mL and 161 U/mL, respectively.

Comparing patients with NRD (no residual disease)  v. optimal macroscopic disease (OMD), there was no statistical difference in the mean CA-125 at diagnosis (1566 U/mL v. 2077 U/mL, p = 0.1).

There was a significant difference in the mean CA-125 prior to interval debulking, 92 v. 233 U/mL (p = 0.001).

In the NRD group, 38 patients (80%) had preoperative CA-125 ≤ 100 U/mL compared to 33 patients (63.4%) in the OMD group (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

 Patients who undergo NACT-IDS (neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery) achieve a high rate of optimal cytoreduction. In our series, after treatment with taxane and platinum-based chemotherapy, patients with a preoperative CA-125 of ≤ 100 U/mL were highly likely to be cytoreduced to no residual disease.

Highlights

► Patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy have high rates of optimal cytoreduction.
► Preoperative CA-125 < 100 may indicate a high probability of debulking to no gross residual disease.
► A drop of > 80% in CA-125 during neoadjuvant treatment may suggest platinum sensitive disease.

abstract: Laparoscopic-assisted cytoreduction for primary advanced ovarian cancer: Success, morbidity and survival

Second-line treatment of first relapse recurrent ovarian cancer.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology abstract

Review Article

cytoreductive surgery • intraperitoneal chemotherapy • ovarian cancer
ABSTRACT

First-line therapy of advanced ovarian cancer involves primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Progression of incompletely resected disease or recurrence after cytoreduction is inevitable. The approach to second-line treatment is ill-defined and chemotherapy remains the conventional approach, with surgery being reserved in some patients to debulk or palliate symptoms. Increasing evidence suggests that secondary cytoreduction improves progression-free and overall survival. This approach may be appropriate in selected patients. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy delivered in the adjuvant setting postoperatively has been shown to be more effective than systemic chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer after primary surgery. However, its use has not been well accepted and has not been adopted in secondary surgery. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy delivered intraoperatively during surgery has been of clinical interest and may prove to be efficacious and advantageous. The support of the gynaecological cancer medical and surgical community to embrace the efforts and assist in the recruitment of appropriate patients into randomised trials of first relapse recurrent ovarian cancer will provide answers to questions and establish evidence that would impact the care of ovarian cancer patients.