OVARIAN CANCER and US: neutropenia

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label neutropenia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neutropenia. Show all posts

Saturday, July 07, 2012

paywalled- Comparison of weekly versus every 3 weeks paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced solid tumors: A meta-analysis



Comparison of weekly versus every 3 weeks paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced solid tumors: A meta-analysis


Abstract

Background

Paclitaxel is commonly given as a 3-h infusion every 3 weeks for a variety of malignancies. Several randomized clinical trials comparing weekly paclitaxel with Q3-week (Q3W) have produced mixed results in terms of efficacy and toxicity creating controversy about the ideal dose and schedule.

Methods

A literature search using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical oncology from 1995 to 2011 was performed..........Moderators of cancer types, ethnicity, and paclitaxel dose ratio were analyzed for primary dependent variables.

Results

Ten trials were included....

Conclusion

Weekly paclitaxel has a favorable toxicity profile compared to the current standard of Q3W paclitaxel.

Thursday, May 17, 2012

paywalled - Gynecologic Oncology - Predictors of severe and febrile neutropenia during primary chemotherapy for ovarian cancer



ScienceDirect.com - Gynecologic Oncology - Predictors of severe and febrile neutropenia during primary chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

Objective

To identify factors that increase the risk of neutropenic events in women with advanced ovarian carcinoma receiving initial chemotherapy.

Methods

Multi-center retrospective study of women with FIGO stage III–IV epithelial ovarian cancer treated postoperatively with multi-agent intravenous chemotherapy from 1995 to 2008. Outcomes were severe (SN; absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 500/mm3) and febrile neutropenia (FN; ANC < 1000/mm3 and temperature > 38.1 °C). Cumulative risk of neutropenic events was estimated by Kaplan Meier method. Multivariate analysis was by Cox proportional hazard regression.

Results

Three hundred twenty-six patients met inclusion criteria. There were 251 SN events among 140 (43%) patients and 24 FN events among 22 (7%) patients. Univariate predictors of SN were body surface area < 2.0 m2 (p = 0.03), body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m2 (p < 0.01), Caucasian race (p < 0.01), treatment on research protocols (p < 0.01), non-carboplatin-containing regimens (p < 0.01), and planned relative dose intensity (RDI) > 85% of standard (p = 0.02). Women over age 60 were more likely to develop FN (p = 0.05). Multivariate predictors of SN were treatment on research protocols (hazard ratio [HR] 1.93; p < 0.01), Caucasian race (HR 2.13; p = 0.01), and planned RDI > 85% (HR 1.69; p = 0.05); predictors of FN were age > 60 (HR 2.84; p = 0.05) and non-carboplatin containing regimens (HR 4.06; p < 0.01).

Conclusion

While SN is fairly common, FN occurs infrequently in women with EOC undergoing taxane and platin-based chemotherapy and primary prophylactic growth factor support is not indicated. However, women older than 60 years of age receiving non-carboplatin containing regimens are at higher risk for FN and warrant closer surveillance.

Monday, May 07, 2012

JCO: A Way Forward on the Medically Appropriate Use of White Cell Growth Factors (hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs))



A Way Forward on the Medically Appropriate Use of White Cell Growth Factors

Discussion points:

  • Are Hematopoietic Colony-Stimulating Factors Over- or Underused?
  • Table 1. Comparison of Major Guidelines
  • How Can These Disparate Conclusions Be Reconciled?
  • CSFs for Dose Maintenance in Routine Noncurative Cancer Care
  • CSFs Used to Treat FN or Afebrile Neutropenia
  • What Is the Harm in Using CSFs?
  • Are CSFs a Prudent Use of Societal Resources?
  • Why Do Oncologists Prescribe CSFs if There Is Minimal Evidence for Benefit?
  • How Did We Arrive at Widespread Use Without Clinical Trial Justification?
  • The Way Forward to Evidence-Based Use of CSFs
  • Disclosures/REFERENCES











"There are concrete steps the US oncology community can take to foster more evidence-based care. The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative51 could add overuse as a quality criterion52 and report CSF use in palliative-intent regimens when there is less than a 20% risk of FN. The major guideline groups (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer,6 National Comprehensive Cancer Network,5 and ASCO4) should endorse dose modification as an equally appropriate and preferred strategy in the absence of proven benefit. "

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

abstract: Predictors of severe and febrile neutropenia during primary chemotherapy for ovarian cancer



Predictors of severe and febrile neutropenia during primary chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.


Abstract

OBJECTIVE: 

To identify factors that increase the risk of neutropenic events in women with advanced ovarian carcinoma receiving initial chemotherapy.

METHODS: 
Multi-center retrospective study of women with FIGO stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer treated postoperatively with multi-agent intravenous chemotherapy 1995-2008.......

CONCLUSION:
While SN is fairly common, FN occurs infrequently in women with EOC undergoing taxane and platin-based chemotherapy and primary prophylactic growth factor support is not indicated. However, women older than 60 years of age receiving non-carboplatin containing regimens are at higher risk for FN and warrant closer surveillance.


Sunday, May 02, 2010

Is chemotherapy-induced neutropenia a prognostic factor in patients with ovarian cancer?



CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia was not a significant prognostic indicator in ovarian cancer patients treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy.