Showing posts with label origin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label origin. Show all posts
Thursday, April 05, 2012
abstract: Ovarian cancer: insights into genetics and pathogeny
Abstract
".......The classic conception of ovarian cancer pathogeny, based on the role of the ovarian surface epithelium, is currently reconsidered, and a novel hypothesis is formulated, which supports direct involvement of the Fallopian tubes for the serous type. Although recent research suggests the implication of immune/inflammatory cells by specific mechanisms in ovarian cancer pathogenesis, there is yet reliable evidence concerning their modality of direct action and/or modulation of tumoral growth. Thus, ovarian carcinogenesis remains a research challenge....
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
abstract - Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports: Ovarian Cancer is an Imported Disease: Fact or Fiction?
Abstract
The cell of origin of ovarian cancer has been long debated. The current paradigm is that epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) arises from the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE). OSE is composed of flat, nondescript cells more closely resembling the mesothelium lining the peritoneal cavity. In light of various histologic types of ovarian carcinoma (serous, endometrioid, and clear cell carcinoma), which have a Müllerian phenotype, it has been argued that the OSE undergoes a process termed “metaplasia” to account for this profound morphologic transformation.
Recent molecular and clinicopathologic studies not only have failed to support this hypothesis but also have provided evidence that EOC stems from Müllerian-derived extraovarian cells that involve the ovary secondarily, thereby calling into question the very existence of primary EOC.
This new model of ovarian carcinogenesis proposes that fallopian tube epithelium (benign or malignant) implants on the ovary to give rise to both high-grade and low-grade serous carcinomas, and that endometrial tissue implants on the ovary and produces endometriosis, which can undergo malignant transformation into endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma.
Thus, ultimately EOC is not ovarian in origin but rather is secondary, and it is logical to conclude that the only true primary ovarian neoplasms are germ cell and gonadal stromal tumors analogous to tumors in the testis. If this new model is confirmed, it has profound implications for the early detection and treatment of “ovarian cancer”.
Recent molecular and clinicopathologic studies not only have failed to support this hypothesis but also have provided evidence that EOC stems from Müllerian-derived extraovarian cells that involve the ovary secondarily, thereby calling into question the very existence of primary EOC.
This new model of ovarian carcinogenesis proposes that fallopian tube epithelium (benign or malignant) implants on the ovary to give rise to both high-grade and low-grade serous carcinomas, and that endometrial tissue implants on the ovary and produces endometriosis, which can undergo malignant transformation into endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma.
Thus, ultimately EOC is not ovarian in origin but rather is secondary, and it is logical to conclude that the only true primary ovarian neoplasms are germ cell and gonadal stromal tumors analogous to tumors in the testis. If this new model is confirmed, it has profound implications for the early detection and treatment of “ovarian cancer”.
Keywords Ovarian cancer – Pathogenesis – Model – Paradigm – Fallopian tube – Endometriosis – Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma – STIC – Serous carcinoma
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
abstract: Metastatic neoplasms of the ovaries: a clinicopathological study of 97 cases (metastatic breast, GI neoplasms....)
OBJECTIVE: To present the clinicopathological features of metastatic ovarian neoplasms with emphasis in the diagnostic challenge.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study including 97 patients with pathological diagnosis of metastatic ovarian neoplasms, examined during the decade 2000-2009. The gross, microscopical and immunohistochemical characteristics as well as the clinical data (age of the patients, origin of the neoplasm, symptoms, treatment options) and 5-year survival rates were examined.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients is 55 years (range 26-78 years). 62.89% of the tumors were metastatic from extragenital organs (from stomach 21.65%, breast 15.46%, colon 15.46%, appendix 3.09%, pancreas 2.06%, lung 1.03% and kidney 1.03%, sarcoma 1.03% melanoma 1.03%) and 37.11% tumors originated from the genital tract. The 3-year survival rates ranged from 25.39% for metastatic ovarian neoplasms originating outside the genital tract up to 29.41% for those originating from the genital tract. Tumor immunohistochemistry is a helpful aid in the differential diagnosis mainly between primary mucinous ovarian tumors and metastatic colon cancers and in the recognition of metastatic breast cancers and other neoplasms of the GI tract.
CONCLUSION: The management of metastatic ovarian neoplasms should include specific immunohistochemical methods in order to identify the primary neoplasm site. The differential diagnosis of a pelvic mass should always include metastatic neoplasms of the ovaries.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study including 97 patients with pathological diagnosis of metastatic ovarian neoplasms, examined during the decade 2000-2009. The gross, microscopical and immunohistochemical characteristics as well as the clinical data (age of the patients, origin of the neoplasm, symptoms, treatment options) and 5-year survival rates were examined.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients is 55 years (range 26-78 years). 62.89% of the tumors were metastatic from extragenital organs (from stomach 21.65%, breast 15.46%, colon 15.46%, appendix 3.09%, pancreas 2.06%, lung 1.03% and kidney 1.03%, sarcoma 1.03% melanoma 1.03%) and 37.11% tumors originated from the genital tract. The 3-year survival rates ranged from 25.39% for metastatic ovarian neoplasms originating outside the genital tract up to 29.41% for those originating from the genital tract. Tumor immunohistochemistry is a helpful aid in the differential diagnosis mainly between primary mucinous ovarian tumors and metastatic colon cancers and in the recognition of metastatic breast cancers and other neoplasms of the GI tract.
CONCLUSION: The management of metastatic ovarian neoplasms should include specific immunohistochemical methods in order to identify the primary neoplasm site. The differential diagnosis of a pelvic mass should always include metastatic neoplasms of the ovaries.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)
