abstract: Minireview: Human Ovarian Cancer: Biology, Current Management, and Paths to Personalizing Therapy. March 13th

Minireview: Human Ovarian Cancer: Biology, Current Management, and Paths to Personalizing Therapy  [Endocrinology. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

Endocrinology. 2012 Mar 13. [Epub ahead of print]

Minireview: Human Ovarian Cancer: Biology, Current Management, and Paths to Personalizing Therapy.

Abstract

More than 90% of ovarian cancers have been thought to arise from epithelial cells that cover the ovarian surface or, more frequently, line subserosal cysts. Recent studies suggest that histologically similar cancers can arise from the fimbriae of Fallopian tubes and from deposits of endometriosis. Different histotypes are observed that resemble epithelial cells from the normal Fallopian tube (serous), endometrium (endometrioid), cervical glands (mucinous), and vaginal rests (clear cell) and that share expression of relevant HOX genes which drive normal gynecological differentiation. Two groups of epithelial ovarian cancers have been distinguished: type I low-grade cancers that present in early stage, grow slowly, and resist conventional chemotherapy but may respond to hormonal manipulation; and type II high-grade cancers that are generally diagnosed in advanced stage and grow aggressively but respond to chemotherapy. Type I cancers have wild-type p53 and BRCA1/2, but have frequent mutations of Ras and Raf as well as expression of IGFR and activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway. Virtually all type II cancers have mutations of p53, and almost half have mutation or dysfunction of BRCA1/2, but other mutations are rare, and oncogenesis appears to be driven by amplification of several growth-regulatory genes that activate the Ras/MAPK and PI3K pathways. Cytoreductive surgery and combination chemotherapy with platinum compounds and taxanes have improved 5-yr survival, but less than 40% of all stages can be cured. Novel therapies are being developed that target high-grade serous cancer cells with PI3Kness or BRCAness as well as the tumor vasculature. Both in silico and animal models are needed that more closely resemble type I and type II cancers to facilitate the identification of novel targets and to predict response to combinations of new agents.

open access: Nature Reviews: Key Advances in Medicine - Ovarian Cancer/Markman page 15-16

Key Advances in Medicine (book)


Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology  (page 15)S11 ovarian cancer | Mutations and non-inferiority analyses show a way forward Maurie Markman      (page 15-16)






Highly clinically relevant ovarian cancer clinical research in 2011 focused on an increased understanding of the biology of the malignancy, limitations of strategies for early detection and screening, and the provocative reports of alternative primary and second-line management strategies.

"Although there were a number of very interesting
preliminary reports of therapeutic
advances in ovarian cancer in 2011 (for
example, bevacizumab in the first-line and
second-line management of the malignancy,
and olaparib  (Blogger's Note: links to Olaparib (parp inhibitor) - Cancer Research UK)  as maintenance therapy for
high-grade serous cancers), as of the writing
of this commentary these studies have not
appeared in the peer-reviewed oncology literature......."

Key advances
■■ There are currently no evidence-based
data supporting the clinical utility of any
ovarian cancer screening strategy in
non‑high-risk populations1
■■ Provocative data suggest there may be a
clinically meaningful difference between
the presence of a BRCA1 or a BRCA2
mutation in influencing outcome in ovarian
cancer6
■■ Under specific circumstances (for example,
neuropathy) it might be reasonable to
substitute pegylated liposomal doxorubicin
for paclitaxel in the front-line chemotherapy
management of ovarian cancer7

Markman, M. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 9, 69–70 (2012); published online 20 December 2011; doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.200

                                   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The articles included in Nature Reviews Key Advances in
Medicine were originally published in the February 2012
issues of the eight clinical Nature Reviews journals. The journals’
editors commissioned international experts to write a short
essay highlighting up to five key papers that made the biggest
contribution to their field in 2011."