OVARIAN CANCER and US

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Thursday, September 19, 2013

Health care’s ‘fix for a generation’ is a disappointment, report says - media/Canada



media (re: report issued today - see blog posts)

Health care’s ‘fix for a generation’ is a disappointment, report says

A decade of health care reforms heralded as a “fix for a generation” has yielded disappointing results and deluded Canadians into thinking their system of care is better than it really is, a report says.

The report, to be released on Thursday, is the latest from the Health Council of Canada, an oversight panel created to monitor the progress of health accords introduced in 2003 and 2004.....

The federal government announced this year that it will end the group’s financing.....

The council was established in 2004 and had a budget of about $6.5-million. The Harper government announced in April that, since the accords it was created to monitor expire in 2014, the council was no longer necessary. It is expected to operate through early next year.
 

Evidence Network: Waiting for Care What’s the Issue?



Waiting

Cancer Screening Trials Rarely Tally Harms, Says Study (expert disagrees...)



 Blogger's Note/Opinion: overdiagnosis may not be one of the most important harms eg. (true) under-diagnosis/mis-diagnosis as examples

medscape

Investigators of cancer-screening interventions such as mammography and colonoscopy "seldom quantify the harms" of their efforts, according to the authors of a quantitative analysis of randomized trials.
The "most important harms" — overdiagnosis and false-positive findings — were quantified in only 7% and 4%, respectively, of the 57 cancer-screening trials reviewed, they note.
"We found that the harms were poorly reported," write the authors, led by Bruno Heleno, PhD, a fellow in the Department of Public Health at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark.
The results were published online September 16 in BMJ.
However, an expert in mammography screening disagrees with this conclusion — strongly.....


 

Long-term follow-up of patients with tumours of the renal pelvis and ureter: How often is a bladder tumour diagnosed after five tumour-free years?



Abstract

USA and Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases.

Objective.
It is not known when cystoscopy follow-up should be terminated after surgery for tumours of the renal pelvis and ureter [upper urinary tract tumours (UUTTs)]. The aim of this study was to investigate the length of the interval from surgery to diagnosis of the first bladder tumour.

Material and methods.
A review was performed of all 930 patients who were diagnosed with a UUTT from 1971 to 1998 in western Sweden. The time to the first bladder tumour was estimated using Kaplan--Meier analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses of potential risk factors for bladder recurrence were performed.

Results.
In total, 614 patients were treated surgically for a renal pelvic or ureteral tumour and underwent cystoscopy at least 3 months afterwards. Of these 614 patients,192 (31.3%) patients developed a bladder tumour after the upper tract surgery. The majority, 157 out of 192 patients (81.8%), were diagnosed during the first 2 years, an additional 24 patients (12.5%) during years 3--5 and 11 patients (5.7%) between years 5 and 20. A history of bladder tumours, large tumour diameter, carcinoma in situ and UUTT diagnosed during the last part of the study period were significant risk factors for bladder recurrence after upper tract surgery.

Conclusion. Cystoscopy should be performed at short intervals during the first 2 years after surgery for a UUTT, in particular among patients with a history of bladder tumours. Late bladder recurrences are unusual; therefore, as a rule, follow-up cystoscopy should be terminated after 5 tumour-free years.
 

Prognostic significance of thrombocytosis, platelet parameters and aggregation rates in epithelial ovarian cancer



Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of preoperative platelet counts, parameters and aggregation rates (maximal aggregation rate: MAR) on prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

Preoperative platelet count, parameters and MAR in 182 EOC patients, 122 patients with benign ovarian tumor and 150 healthy women were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between thrombocytosis, platelet parameters, MAR and clinicopathological factors were evaluated in EOC.

Results

Forty-five (24.73%) EOC patients had preoperative thrombocytosis in this study. The mean platelet count in the EOC group was significantly higher than that of benign and healthy groups (P < 0.001). The MAR in the EOC group was significantly higher than that in the healthy group (71.96% vs 57.03%, P  = 0.025). The platelet parameters (mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, thrombocytocrit and large platelet ratio) were consistently higher in the EOC group than those in the benign and healthy groups, but the differences were insignificant. A significant correlation between thrombocytosis and MAR was observed in EOC patients (r = 0.694, P < 0.001). EOC patients with thrombocytosis were found to have significantly higher grade (P = 0.048), more advanced stage (P = 0.045), higher level carbohydrate antigen-125 (P = 0.007) and greater likelihood of suboptimal cytoreduction (P = 0.035). EOC patients with both thrombocytosis and high MAR were found to have shorter progression-free survival (P = 0.001)and overall survival (P  = 0.004). The combination of thrombocytosis and MAR, as well as stage and optimal cytoreduction, retained significance as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival.

Conclusion

Thrombocytosis, accompanied by increasing of platelet aggregation rates, is associated with more aggressive tumor biology in EOC. The combination of thrombocytosis and MAR is an independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival in EOC patients.

CVac: Ovarian Cancer Drug Study Shows No Difference - Drugs.com MedNews



 MedNews

 
SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA - Prima BioMed Ltd (ASX: PRR; NASDAQ: PBMD; ISIN: US74154B2034) (“Prima”, the “Company”) today announced top-line analysis of the CAN-003 phase 2 study of CVac for treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer patients in first or second remission.

Results indicate that CVac was generally well tolerated, with no Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) considered related to protocol therapy. The majority of non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) were considered mild and transient in nature.

While variable, immune monitoring data indicate that CVac induces a T cell response which may be beneficial for patients with ovarian cancer. No evidence was seen of a humoral (or antibody) response after CVac administration which is also considered a positive signal.

Although this study was not adequately powered to detect statistical significance, the estimate of median progression-free survival (PFS) for all randomized patients resulted in no observed difference between the CVac and control groups.

The median PFS was also estimated separately for patients in first and second remission. In first remission, the median PFS favored the control arm when compared to the CVac treated patients. In second remission, the median PFS favored CVac as compared to patients on the control group. However, neither of these trends was statistically significant.

It is considered too early to make conclusions based on Overall Survival (OS) data. Prima will continue to monitor patient outcomes on the CAN-003 trial until overall survival data matures.
As previously advised, further study information will be presented by Dr. Jeffrey Goh at the European Cancer Congress in Amsterdam on October 1st, 2013. Prima’s management will hold a teleconference to discuss results in more detail after Dr. Goh’s presentation.
Inconclusive PFS data are consistent with the trial results of a number of cancer immunotherapy products. Trials of sipuleucel-T and ipilimumab, and the recently reported trial of MAGE-A3 immunotherapy, indicate that PFS (and similar endpoints like disease-free survival) may not be useful markers of clinical benefit for cancer immunotherapeutics. Importantly, however, several immunotherapies demonstrate the ability to extend overall survival and OS was the basis for marketing approvals for sipuleucel-T and ipilimumab.

Prima will engage with regulators to make appropriate amendments to the clinical development plan for CVac in ovarian cancer and identify the most appropriate endpoints for evaluation of clinical benefit. Until then, Prima has temporarily suspended enrollment on its CAN-004 (“CANVAS”) clinical trial, which had been designed with PFS as the primary endpoint. Patients currently enrolled on the CANVAS trial may continue on the protocol as currently designed.

Matthew Lehman, Prima’s CEO: “All of us at Prima want to thank the patients, their families, and the physicians for their involvement in the CAN-003 trial. We are pleased that CVac has continued to demonstrate a favorable side effect profile and positive immune activity. We are committed to progressing our CVac clinical trials – in ovarian cancer as well as other cancer types – in an expeditious manner.”

About the CAN-003 trial
CAN-003 is a 63-patient phase 2 study evaluating the effects of CVac, as compared to an observation-only control arm, in epithelial ovarian cancer patients in complete remission after first or second line treatment. The primary objectives of the trial are to determine the safety of CVac administration and to determine CVac’s effect on progression-free survival. Secondary objectives of the trial are to determine CVac’s effect of overall survival and to evaluate host immunologic responses to CVac. In accordance with the protocol design, the first seven patients on the trial were all assigned to receive CVac in order to test the comparability of product manufacturing in a new facility. The subsequent 56 patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion and assigned to either the CVac group or observational control group.

Impact of Preoperative Anemia on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Radical Nephroureterectomy (Lynch Syndrome patients)



 Blogger's Note: of interest to Lynch Syndrome affect patients

Abstract

Conclusions

Preoperative anemia is an independent predictor for disease recurrence and cancer-specific mortality and is associated with aggressive tumor features in UTUC patients treated with RNU. Hemoglobin levels represent a promising marker for patient counseling and risk stratification for additional treatment decision-making.
 

How do Canadian primary care physicians rate the health care system? video



Why the long waits in Canadian health care? (video)



Health Council Canada Sept 2013: Better health, better care, better value for all: Refocusing health care reform in Canada



Report



Today, the Health Council of Canada releases its latest report, Better health, better care, better value for all, showing that a decade of health care reform in Canada has produced disappointing results for taxpayers and patients alike.
The report finds that with some exceptions, changes to health care have not kept pace with the evolving needs of Canadians:
  • Progress on wait times for key procedures cited in the Health Accords has stalled.
  • Primary health care services lag behind other countries.
  • Home care services do not address long-term needs.
  • Prescription drug costs remain beyond the means of many Canadians

Supporting Materials:
News release: Health Council of Canada report on decade of health reform finds governments’ status quo approach is failing Canadians
Fact sheet
Table 1: Changes in care Canadians have received over the last decade and Canada’s international ranking
Table 2: Changes in Canadians’ health over the last decade and Canada’s international ranking
Figure 3: An approach to achieving a high-performing health system in Canada 

Table 2

At 218 deaths per 100,000, Canada
ranks seventh out of 11 countries
in cancer mortality. (Best: Switzerland,
188 per 100,000


 

Baseline Blood Work Before Initiation of Chemotherapy: What Is Safe in the Real World?



BAbstract


Introduction: 

This is an observational study of patterns of practice of the timing of baseline blood work (BBW) before chemotherapy initiation. The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of significant changes in laboratory values within 6 weeks before therapy. 

Methods: 

All consecutive patients receiving chemotherapy within a 6-month period were analyzed retrospectively. Time interval between date of chemotherapy initiation and nearest blood work was calculated. Data from patients with one or more sets of values within 6 weeks were used to evaluate dosing changes. Changes in laboratory values collected closest to the date of chemotherapy and values collected before that but within 6 weeks were graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria. A change of ≥ 1 grade was considered clinically meaningful. 

Results: 

Five hundred ninety-two patients were included. Median interval between BBW and initiation of chemotherapy was 4 days. Three hundred thirty-five patients had two or more sets of laboratory tests within the 6-week period, 33% of patients had a meaningful change in one or more values. The majority of changes occurred in hemoglobin (22%), ALT (14%), WBC (11%) and AST(10%), yet only 66% of patients had liver function tests as part of the BBW. 


Conclusions: 

Adherence to the institutional recommendation of BBW within 6 weeks was high. Baseline laboratory tests performed within 7 days of chemotherapy initiation would have detected nearly all significant changes; therefore, we suggest that this interval be tested in future randomized trials.
 

Different types of narratives have different effects on patients' health decision-making processes



medical news

"Individuals often turn to others for advice when making choices. Perhaps, it seems fitting then, that individuals would seek out others when they are faced with important health decisions. Yet, health communicators have debated whether stories should be included in patient decision-aids (which are informational materials designed to help patients make educated choices about their health) because they worry stories are too biased. Now, an MU researcher has found that stories used in decision-aids don't necessarily bias patients' decision-making; rather, certain types of stories can help patients confidently make informed decisions that fit their individual health needs.... 

Invited Commentary: Too Frail for Surgery? I



Abstract (none- subscriber based to view ($$$)

Invited Commentary

Refers To
Purchase $31.50
 

Too Frail for Surgery? Initial Results of a Large Multidisciplinary Prospective Study Examining Preoperative Variables Predictive of Poor Surgical Outcomes



Abstract


Background

The decision as to whether a patient can tolerate surgery is often subjective and can misjudge a patient's true physiologic state. The concept of frailty is an important assessment tool in the geriatric medical population, but has only recently gained attention in surgical patients. Frailty potentially represents a measureable phenotype, which, if quantified with a standardized protocol, could reliably estimate the risk of adverse surgical outcomes.

Study Design

Frailty was prospectively evaluated in the clinic setting in patients consenting for major general, oncologic, and urologic procedures. Evaluation included an established assessment tool (Hopkins Frailty Score), self-administered questionnaires, clinical assessment of performance status, and biochemical measures. Primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications.

Results

There were189 patients evaluated: 117 from urology, 52 from surgical oncology, and 20 from general surgery clinics. Mean age was 62 years, 59.8% were male, and 71.4% were Caucasian. Patients who scored intermediately frail or frail on the Hopkins Frailty Score were more likely to experience postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 2.07, 95% CI 1.05 to 4.08, p = 0.036). Of all other preoperative assessment tools, only higher hemoglobin (p = 0.033) had a significant association and was protective for 30-day complications.

Conclusions

The aggregate score of patients as “intermediately frail or frail” on the Hopkins Frailty Score was predictive of a patient experiencing a postoperative complication. This preoperative assessment tool may prove beneficial when weighing the risks and benefits of surgery, allowing objective data to guide surgical decision-making and patient counseling.
 
Purchase $31.50
 

Scientists improve popular chemotherapy drug (2nd source)



medical news

Extremely potent and improved new derivatives of successful anticancer drug - Vinblastine/Vincristine



medical news

"...Since the 1960s, vinblastine has been used successfully in combination with other chemotherapy drugs against lymphomas as well as testicular, ovarian, breast, bladder and lung cancers."

"...A significant limitation of vinblastine and vincristine is that, with extended treatment, they may evoke a powerful form of drug resistance. This resistance comes from a doorkeeper-type molecule called P-glycoprotein (Pgp), which transports infiltrating drug molecules out of the cancer cells. As cancer cells evolve to produce more and more Pgp, drugs fail to reach effective concentrations in cells and cancerous growth resumes....



  

National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month in September Turns Rare Spotlight on Ovarian Cancer



press release

"Today 70% of women with ovarian cancer will die of their disease compared to less than 20% of breast cancer patients."

""Ovarian cancer patients have been treated almost the same way for the last 40 years using a trial-and-error approach, especially for the 75% of women who recur following standard-of-care treatment. Oncologists today know that tumors are unique, and the technology often exists to guide treatment decisions. It's critical that we make it available to patients who need help personalizing their treatment. We don't have to wait for a cure. We can help patients today," says Ms. Theakston of The Clearity Foundation......

  

Chemo Patients Pose Potential Public Health Risk - media



press release

Urgent surgery: a forgotten wait time? - Healthy Debate



Healthy Debate

"...Often, but not always, hospitals with these services have dedicated operating room blocks for urgent procedures so that patients are not left waiting. “Why act as though an emergency is unexpected?” asks Nathens. “Depending on the surgical specialty, over a third of all surgical cases are urgent – why not plan adequately for emergency surgical care?” ....

clinical trial: Data Collection for Patients With Low Grade Ovarian Carcinoma: Ovarian Cancer Clinical...



Still Recruiting

Verified by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, September 2013
First Received: June 18, 2007 | Last Updated: September 16, 2013
Phase: N/A | Start Date: May 2006
Overall Status: Recruiting | Estimated Enrollment: 1000

Brief Summary


Official Title: “Data Collection for Patients With Low Grade Ovarian Carcinoma



The goal of this psychosocial research study is to collect information on patients with one of the above-mentioned low-grade tumors. Researchers want to maintain these patients' information in a research database to help learn and better understand these tumor types and to help develop better treatments for them.....
 

Ovarian stem cells: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence



Open access

Abstract (provisional)

Background

Lei and Spradling in a recent study published in PNAS failed to detect 'germline cysts' by elegant studies using lineage tracing approach and thus concluded that adult mouse ovaries lack stem cells. They proposed that primordial follicle pool generated during fetal life is sufficient to sustain oogenesis and that there is no renewal of oocytes during adult life. Contrary to their results, we have reported presence of very small pluripotent, embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs), their immediate descendants (OGSCs) and germ cell 'cysts' or 'nests' (formed by rapid cell division and incomplete cytokinesis) in surface epithelial cell smears of adult sheep, monkey and human ovaries.

Methods

In the present study, ovaries were collected from adult mouse (treated with 5 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin, PMSG) and sheep (from slaughter house) and testis from mouse treated with busulphan (25 mg/Kg). Ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cells and testicular smears were studied for the presence of cysts. Sheep OSE smears were also used to show cytoplasmic continuity amongst the cyst cells studied by immunolocalization and confocal microscopy of stem cells specific markers OCT-4 and SSEA-4.

Results

Cysts were observed and confocal microscopy imaging confirmed cytoplasmic continuity amongst the cells comprising the cysts.

Conclusions

Cysts represent self-renewal and clonal expansion of stem cells with incomplete cytokinesis and are a hallmark feature of stem cells. We suggest the use of PMSG stimulated mouse ovaries and use of more primitive markers like OCT-4 or STELLA rather than MVH for lineage tracing studies to conclusively show presence of stem cells by lineage-tracing studies.

The complete article is available as a provisional PDF. The fully formatted PDF and HTML versions are in production. 

 References
1. Lei L, Spradling AC: Female mice lack adult germ-line stem cells but sustain oogenesis
using stable primordial follicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:8585–8590.
2. Pepling ME: Follicular assembly: mechanisms of action. Reproduction 2012, 143:139–
149.
3. Lesch BJ, Page DC: Genetics of germ cell development. Nat Rev Genet 2012, 13:781–
794.

 

 

open access: Economic Burden of Cancer Survivorship Among Adults in the United States



"Lastly,we were unable to examine the burden by cancer site given inadequate sample size."

"....In summary, the economic burden of cancer survivorship is
substantial, resulting in excess health care expenditures and lost productivity
costs among survivors compared with individuals without a
history of cancer. The economic impact of cancer is considerable and
long lasting. Although the economic burden is greatest shortly after
diagnosis, the burden is also high years after a cancer diagnosis. With
the number of cancer survivors projected to increase to nearly 18
million by 2022,1 the economic burden of cancer is also likely to
increase. Multifaceted prevention strategies including research, education,
policy change, and sustained intervention programs may help
reduce the economic impact of cancer. Information in this article
characterizing the major sources of economic burden may be helpful
in guiding the development of comprehensive intervention programs
to improve the quality of the cancer survivorship experience and
decrease the burden of cancer in the United States."

Inpatient versus outpatient management of neutropenic fever in gynecologic oncology patients: Is risk stratification useful?



Abstract


Highlights

MASCC risk index score appears predictive of which NF patients will be low risk.
MASCC predicts high-risk NF patients in half of cases.
Low-risk patients per MASCC scoring endure fewer complications and lower mortality.


Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the utility of risk stratification of gynecologic oncology patients with neutropenic fever (NF).

Methods

A retrospective chart review of gynecologic cancer patients admitted with NF from 2007 to 2011 was performed, wherein demographic, oncologic, and NF characteristics (hospitalization length, complications, and death) were collected. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index score was calculated; low risk was considered ≥ 21. SAS 9.2 was used for statistical analyses.

Results

Eighty-three patients met the study criteria. Most (92%) were Caucasian and had advanced stage disease (71%). Primary tumors were 58% ovary, 35% endometrium, and 6% cervix. All patients were receiving chemotherapy on admission (72% for primary, 28% for recurrent disease). Forty-eight percent had a positive culture, and most (58%) positive cultures were urine. Seventy-six percent of patients were considered low risk. High-risk patients were more likely to have a severe complication (10% versus 50%, p = 0.0003), multiple severe complications (3% versus 20%, p = 0.0278), ICU admission (2% versus 40%, p < 0.0001), overall mortality (2% versus 15%, p = 0.0417), and death due to neutropenic fever (0% versus 15%, p = 0.0124). MASCC had a positive predictive value of 50% and negative predictive value of 90%. The median MASCC score for all patients was 22 (range, 11–26), but the median MASCC score for those with death or a severe complication was 17 (range, 11–24).

Conclusion

Based on this pilot data, MASCC score appears promising in determining suitability for outpatient management of NF in gynecologic oncology patients. Prospective study is ongoing to confirm safety and determine impact on cost.

Purchase $39.95
 

A Reappraisal Part II – The role of Omentectomy in the staging and treatment of Apparent Early Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer



TAbstract


Highlights

Isolated extra-ovarian spread to the omentum is relatively rare.
For staging purposes, omental biopsies may provide as much information as omentectomy
When omental biopsy might suffice, minimally invasive techniques could play an increased role.

Objective

This article reviews the literature concerning the role of omentectomy in the staging and treatment of clinically apparent early stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods

A review of the English language literature based on a MEDLINE (PubMed) database search using the key words: ovary, cancer, carcinoma, omentum, and omentectomy. An additional collection of reports was found by systematically reviewing all references from retrieved papers.

Results

Historically, the realization that ovarian cancer cells have a predisposition to metastasize to the omentum has led to the inclusion of omentectomy, both for the purpose of accurate staging of ovarian cancer and for its possible therapeutic benefit. In apparently early stage epithelial ovarian cancer, microscopic disease in the omentum is found in 0-22% of the cases; however extra-ovarian disease isolated to the omentum is found in 2-7% of cases at most. There are no specific guidelines as to how much of the omentum should be removed, but pathology studies show that for the purpose of staging and detecting microscopic disease, omental biopsies are probably sufficient in a grossly normal appearing omentum. In cases where adjuvant chemotherapy is planned, the role of ometectomy appears to be primarily for staging, while its therapeutic role remains unclear in microscopic omental disease.

Conclusions

In apparent early stage ovarian cancer, the presence of isolated omental metastases is relatively rare. For staging purposes in such cases, random omental biopsies rather than total omentectomy may suffice. Furthermore, chemotherapy appears to effectively treat microscopic disease and therefore if this is already planned the benefit of omentectomy is unclear.
 

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

The Omentum and Omentectomy In Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Reappraisal



Abstract

Review


Highlights

The role of the omentum in the human body remains incompletely understood.
The omentum serves as a reservoir of immune cells in the peritoneal cavity.
There is conflicting data from animal models as to whether the omentum prevents or promotes cancer.

Objective

This article reviews the literature concerning the function of the omentum and how it came to be part of the staging and treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods

A review of the English language literature based on a MEDLINE (PubMed) database search using the key words: ovary, cancer, carcinoma, omentum, and omentectomy. An additional collection of reports was found by systematically reviewing all references from retrieved papers.

Results

Descriptions of the omentum can be found as far back as the time of the ancient Egyptians. An immunologic role of the omentum was confirmed in 1980s when “milky spots” were described. Omentectomy arrived as part of the ovarian cancer guidelines in the 1960s after observing that the omentum was a frequent site of metastasis and that patients with removal of all diseased tissue did better. The exact role of the omentum in immunology and cancer remains incompletely understood.

Conclusions

Historically, occult omental metastases in otherwise early disease have led to the inclusion of omentectomy for the purpose of accurate staging and for a possible therapeutic benefit. Laboratory studies on the role in cancer of the omental fat and milky spots are controversial.

Purchase $39.95
 

Synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary in young women: A Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study



Abstract


Highlights

Aim: the incidence of synchronous endometrial/ovarian cancer in young women.
Unlike previous reports (11-9%), the incidence was quietly low (4.5%).

Abstract

Objective

Some authors have recommended the use of diagnostic laparoscopy as a pretreatment assessment step for conservative hormonal treatment in young women with endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of synchronous primary cancer of the endometrium and ovary in young women.

Methods

The medical records of 3240 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery between 1995 and 2010 were collected from 7 institutions and were retrospectively reviewed. Low-risk endometrial cancer was defined as tumors without myometrial invasion; normal or benign-looking ovaries; normal CA-125; grade 1 endometrioid histology; and early stage endometrial cancer on pretreatment assessment.

Results

Fifteen percent (471/3240) were younger than 40 years of age. The incidence of synchronous ovarian cancer in young women with endometrial cancer was 4.5% (21/471). In patients with low-risk endometrial cancer, synchronous cancers were not identified.

Conclusion

The incidence of synchronous ovarian malignancies in young women with endometrial cancer was quiet low (4.5%), unlike previous studies have revealed (11-29%). Therefore, diagnostic laparoscopy is not mandatory in patients with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer selected for conservative treatment to confirm the absence of ovarian malignancy.

Purchase $39.95
 

Patient protection from conflicted medical guidelines



 Health News Review

Patient protection

Talking with patients and families: Challenges and tips



Canadian Virtual Hospice 

Symptoms, CA125 and HE4 for the preoperative prediction of ovarian malignancy in Brazilian women with ovarian masses



open access

Background

This manuscript evaluates whether specific symptoms, a symptom index (SI), CA125 and HE4 can help identify women with malignant tumors in the group of women with adnexal masses previously diagnosed with ultrasound.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study with data collection between January 2010 and January 2012. We invited 176 women with adnexal masses of suspected ovarian origin, attending the hospital of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Unicamp School of Medicine. A control group of 150 healthy women was also enrolled. Symptoms were assessed with a questionnaire tested previously. Women with adnexal masses were interviewed before surgery to avoid recall bias. The Ward Agglomerative Method was used to define symptom clusters. Serum measurements of CA125 and HE4 were made. The Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) was calculated using standard formulae.

Results

Sixty women had ovarian cancer and 116 benign ovarian tumors. Six symptom clusters were formed and three specific symptoms (back pain, leg swelling and able to feel abdominal mass) did not agglomerate. A symptom index (SI) using clusters abdomen, pain and eating was formed. The sensitivity of the SI in discriminating women with malignant from those with benign ovarian tumors was 78.3%, with a specificity of 60.3%. Positive SI was more frequent in women with malignant than in women with benign tumors (OR 5.5; 95% CI 2.7 to 11.3). Elevated CA125 (OR 11.8; 95%CI 5.6 to 24.6) or HE4 (OR 7.6; 95%CI 3.7 to 15.6) or positive ROMA (OR 9.5; 95%CI 4.4 to 20.3) were found in women with malignant tumors compared with women with benign tumors. The AUC-ROC for CA125 was not different from that for HE4 or ROMA. The best specificity and negative predictive values were obtained using CA125 in women with negative SI.

Conclusion

Women diagnosed with an adnexal mass could benefit from a short enquiry about presence, frequency and onset of six symptoms, and CA125 measurements. Primary care physicians can be thereby assisted in deciding as to whether or not reference the woman to often busy, congested specialized oncology centers.

The complete article is available as a provisional PDF. The fully formatted PDF and HTML versions are in production.



 

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Medical Errors Abuse and intimidation at McGill (Montreal) affiliated hospitals (patient and physician safety)



The Media Co-op

"....Dr. Nataros said that when he decided to report the medical errors, the doctors involved in the incident responded by getting a number of their colleagues to write letters accusing him of being argumentative and disrespecting authority. He also said that Dr. Sarkis Meterissian, the Postgraduate Director of Family Medicine at McGill University, attempted to defame his name. In a letter, which Dr. Nataros provided to The Dominion, Dr. Meterissian suggested that Dr. Nataros may suffer from a mental illness and requested that he undergo a medical evaluation.
Dr. Meterissian told The Dominion he could not comment on the specifics of Dr. Nataros’ case because the matter was currently in front of the Collège des médecins du Québec (the province’s professional order of physicians). Dr. Nataros claimed that the treatment he has received is an example of the intimidation that many med students and young doctors face....  

Angiogenesis as a target for the treatment of ovarian cancer : Current Opinion in Oncology



Abstract

Purpose of review: Angiogenesis has been validated as a target in ovarian cancer through four randomized trials that have reported improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with ovarian cancer whose conventional treatment was supplemented with concurrent and maintenance administration of the antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody, bevacizumab. These trials [the International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group trial (ICON7), the Gynecologic Oncology Group trial (GOG218), OCEANS and AURELIA] have shown that the tumour vasculature is a valid target throughout the lifetime of patients with ovarian cancer. This review seeks to address some of the remaining questions surrounding the optimal strategy for the use of bevacizumab (Avastin) in ovarian cancer.

Recent findings: The first-line trials, ICON7 and GOG218, showed improvements in PFS and in the case of ICON7, an early analysis reported increased overall survival in a predefined group of patients at high risk of disease progression. Trials in recurrent disease, OCEANS and AURELIA, also showed improvements in PFS, raising questions about whether VEGF-inhibiting agents should be confined to first-line therapy, second-line therapy or both.

Summary: Both the first-line trials stopped maintenance bevacizumab after 12 and 15 months, respectively; yet, current data suggest that maintenance therapy should continue at least until progression. In addition, current research is focussing on the identification of predictive biomarkers for VEGF inhibitors and candidates have been identified. Thus, the true clinical benefit from VEGF pathway inhibitors in the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer is likely to increase over the next few years.
 

Sonographic Follow-up of Ovarian Masses



Medscape

Hello. I'm Andrew Kaunitz, Professor and Associate Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Florida College of Medicine in Jacksonville. Today I would like to discuss sonographic follow-up of ovarian masses.

Although transvaginal ultrasound's role in detecting ovarian masses is well recognized, screening programs based on ultrasound have led to high numbers of surgeries for each malignancy encountered.[1] Investigators analyzed data from 1987 to 2012 that involved more than 39,000 asymptomatic participants in a long-standing annual ovarian cancer screening program at the University of Kentucky.[2] After an abnormal screening sonogram, repeat imaging was scheduled at intervals ranging from 6 weeks to 6 months. Women underwent surgery if the sonographic appearance of the mass progressed, if its volume increased substantially, or if the mass began to cause symptoms.

Overall, abnormal ovarian findings were noted at some point in almost 20% of women screened. Two thirds of the masses were low-risk, including simple cysts and cysts with septations. One third of the masses were considered to be high-risk, a designation that included cysts with solid areas and mostly solid masses. Within 1 year of follow-up, more than one third of low-risk masses and more than three quarters of high-risk masses resolved.

As screening algorithms evolved during the 25-year study period, the investigators increasingly used serial sonography for follow-up of ovarian masses. Initially, no masses were followed in this way, then simple cysts were followed, and then all masses were followed. Overall, 557 women, representing 1.4% of all women screened, underwent surgery.

As the investigators became more experienced during this long-term screening program, the proportion of women found to have malignancy at the time of surgery increased from 8% to 25% by the end of the study.

This report's finding that many ovarian masses (including those with complex features) eventually resolve points to a strategy that can minimize the use of surgery in managing asymptomatic women who have abnormal ovarian findings with vaginal ultrasound. The authors suggested that the frequency of sonographic follow-up should vary according to the initial morphology of the mass as well as its stability over time. Complex masses that increase in size or complexity should be surgically removed.

Thank you. I am Andrew Kaunitz.

References

  1. Buys SS, Partridge E, Black A, et al; PLCO Project Team. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2011;305:2295-2303. Abstract
  2. Pavlik EJ, Ueland FR, Miller RW, et al. Frequency and disposition of ovarian abnormalities followed with serial transvaginal ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:210-217. Abstract

 

+AllTrials (international reporting of all clinical trials)




 

Blogger's Note: see prior postings on +AllTrials plus a Cochrane reference page


 August 2013

The AllTrials campaign calls for all past and present clinical trials to be registered and their results reported.

Clinical trials are investigations designed to assess the effects – wanted and unwanted - of healthcare interventions. The Declaration of Helsinki, which is the World Medical Association’s statement of principles for medical research involving people, states that every investigator running a clinical trial should register it and report its results. Millions of volunteers have participated in clinical trials to help find out more about the effects of treatments on disease, yet that important ethical principle about reporting has been widely ignored. This is what led to the AllTrials campaign in January 2013, a campaign which is now supported by thousands of individual patients, clinicians and researchers across the world, and by hundreds of organisations representing millions of people.
This document sets out more information about achieving a situation globally where all trials are registered and results reported. It is an achievement that will involve regulators and registries, clinical trial funders, universities and institutes, professional and learned societies and medical journals, patients and researchers.
This document is part of a continuing discussion which many different organisations are working on elaborating further over coming weeks and months. Please email views and contributions to: alltrials@senseaboutscience.org.......

Cochrane Review: Risk of ovarian cancer in women treated with ovarian stimulating drugs for infertility



Blogger's Note: updated to include plain english summary (Cochrane)

Plain language summary

Is there an increased risk of ovarian cancer in women treated with drugs for subfertility?

Drugs to stimulate ovulation have been widely used for various types of subfertility since the early 1960s and their use has increased in recent years. Subfertile women are commonly exposed to these agents, which may be administered at high doses for long periods of time during treatment for subfertility. There is uncertainty about the safety of these drugs and the potential risk of causing cancers associated with their use.
Overall, based on 25 studies, which included a total of 182,972 women, we found no evidence that the risk of ovarian cancer was increased in women treated with fertility drugs, compared with subfertile women untreated with fertility drugs, or women in the general population.
Five of the 25 studies showed an increase in the risk of ovarian cancer, but these studies were of low methodological quality and therefore the results are too unreliable to conclude that there is a definitive risk of cancer while on treatment for subfertility.
More research studies, which are of high quality, are needed to determine whether there is an increased risk of ovarian cancer in women treated with fertility drugs.


BACKGROUND: The use of assisted reproductive techniques is increasing, but the possible link between fertility drugs and ovarian cancer remains controversial.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of ovarian cancer in women treated with ovulation stimulating drugs for subfertility.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched for published and unpublished observational studies from 1990 to February 2013. The following databases were used: the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Collaborative Review Group's Trial Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2013, Issue 1, MEDLINE (to February week 4 2013), EMBASE (to 2013 week 09) and databases of conference abstracts. We also scanned reference lists of retrieved articles. The search was not restricted by language of publication.
SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies, and case series including more than 30 participants, reporting on women with exposure to ovarian stimulating drugs for treatment of subfertility and histologically confirmed borderline or invasive ovarian cancer.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently conducted eligibility and 'Risk of bias' assessment, and extracted data. We grouped studies based on the fertility drug used for two outcomes: borderline ovarian tumours and invasive ovarian cancer. We expressed findings as adjusted odds ratio (OR), risk ratio (RR), hazard ratio (HR) or crude OR if adjusted values were not reported and standardised incidence ratio (SIR) where reported. We conducted no meta-analyses due to expected methodological and clinical heterogeneity.
MAIN RESULTS: We included 11 case-control studies and 14 cohort studies, which included a total of 182,972 women.Seven cohort studies showed no evidence of an increased risk of invasive ovarian cancer in subfertile women treated with any drug compared with untreated subfertile women. Seven case-control studies showed no evidence of an increased risk, compared with control women of a similar age. Two cohort studies reported an increased incidence of invasive ovarian cancer in subfertile women treated with any fertility drug compared with the general population. One of these reported a SIR of 5.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 15), based on three cancer cases, and a decreased risk when cancer cases diagnosed within one year of treatment were excluded from the analysis(SIR 1.67, 95% CI 0.02 to 9.27). The other cohort study reported an OR of 2.09 (95% CI 1.39 to 3.12), based on 26 cases.For borderline ovarian tumours, exposure to any fertility drug was associated with a two to three-fold increased risk in two case-control studies. One case-control study reported an OR of 28 (95% CI 1.5 to 516), which was based on only four cases. In one cohort study, there was more than a two-fold increase in the incidence of borderline tumours compared with the general population (SIR 2.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 4.6) and in another the risk of a borderline ovarian tumour was HR 4.23 (95% CI 1.25 to 14.33) for subfertile women treated with in vitro fertilisation (IVF) compared with a non-IVF treated group with more than one year of follow-up.There was no evidence of an increased risk in women exposed to clomiphene alone or clomiphene plus gonadotrophin, compared with unexposed women. One case-control study reported an increased risk in users of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)(OR 9.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 52). However, this estimate is based on only six cases with a history of HMG use.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no convincing evidence of an increase in the risk of invasive ovarian tumours with fertility drug treatment. There may be an increased risk of borderline ovarian tumours in subfertile women treated with IVF. Studies showing an increase in the risk of ovarian cancer had a high overall risk of bias, due to retrospective study design, lack of accounting for potential confounding and estimates based on a small number of cases. More studies at low risk of bias are needed.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23943232/


Sent from my iPhone

Late morbidity leading to hospitalization among 5-year survivors of young adult cancer: A report of the childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors (CAYACS) research program



abstract

To estimate the risk of late morbidity leading to hospitalization among young adult cancer 5-yr survivors compared to the general population and to examine the long-term effects of demographic and disease-related factors on late morbidity, a retrospective cohort of 902 5-yr survivors of young adult cancer diagnosed between 1981 and 1999 was identified from British Columbia (BC) Cancer Registry. A matched comparison group (N=9020) was randomly selected from the provincial health insurance plan. All hospitalizations until the end of 2006 were determined from the BC health insurance plan hospitalization records. The Poisson regression model was used to estimate the rate ratios for late morbidity leading to hospitalization after adjusting for socio-demographic and clinical risk factors. Overall, 455(50.4%) survivors and 3419 (37.9%) individuals in the comparison group had at least one type of late morbidity leading to hospitalization. The adjusted risk of this morbidity for survivors was 1.4 times higher than for the comparison group (95% CI, 1.22-1.54). The highest risks were found for hospitalization due to blood disease (RR, 4.2; 95%CI, 1.98-8.78) and neoplasm (RR, 4.3; 95%CI, 3.41-5.33) except pregnancy. Survivors with three treatment modalities had three folds higher risk of having any type of late morbidity (RR, 3.22; 95%CI,2.09-4.94) than the comparison. These findings emphasize that young adult cancer survivors still have high risks of a wide range of late morbidities.


 

Evidence for Democracy Death of Evidence public science - Canada



Canada

DNA Double Take - NYTimes.com



DNA Double Take

CDC - Gynecologic Cancers - Ovarian Cancer



CDC

Ovarian Cancer

Diagram of the female genital tract depicting fallopian tubes, ovaries, uterus, cervix, vagina, and vulva. Cancer is a disease in which cells in the body grow out of control. Cancer is always named for the part of the body where it starts, even if it spreads to other body parts later. When cancer starts in the ovaries, it is called ovarian cancer. Women have two ovaries that are located in the pelvis, one on each side of the uterus. The ovaries make female hormones and produce eggs.
Ovarian cancer causes more deaths than any other cancer of the female reproductive system. But when ovarian cancer is found in its early stages, treatment is most effective. Ovarian cancer often causes signs and symptoms, so it is important to pay attention to your body and know what is normal for you. Symptoms may be caused by something other than cancer, but the only way to know is to see your doctor, nurse, or other health care professional.

Learn more about ovarian cancer and its signs and symptoms by reading Basic Information About Ovarian Cancer or downloading the Inside Knowledge campaign's ovarian cancer fact sheet. Adobe PDF file [PDF-859KB]

Who Gets Ovarian Cancer?

All women are at risk for ovarian cancer, but older women are more likely to get the disease than younger women. About 90% of women who get ovarian cancer are older than 40 years of age, with the greatest number of cases occurring in women aged 60 years or older.
Each year, about 20,000 women in the United States get ovarian cancer. Among women in the United States, ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death, after lung and bronchus, breast, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. Ovarian cancer causes more deaths than any other cancer of the female reproductive system, but it accounts for only about 3% of all cancers in women. When ovarian cancer is found in its early stages, treatment is most effective.†
Source: U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2009 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2013. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/uscs.
 

CDC - Ovarian Cancer Trends



CDC

Note: The word "significantly" below refers to statistical significance. 2009 is the latest year for which data are available.

Incidence Trends

From 2000 to 2009 in the United States, incidence of ovarian cancer has—
  • Decreased significantly by 1.9% per year among women.
  • Decreased significantly by 2.0% per year among white women.
  • Decreased significantly by 1.0% per year among black women.
  • Decreased significantly by 1.5% per year among Hispanic women.
  • Remained level among American Indian/Alaska Native women.
  • Decreased significantly by 1.3% per year among Asian/Pacific Islander women.

Mortality Trends

From 2000 to 2009 in the United States, deaths from ovarian cancer have—
  • Decreased significantly by 1.5% per year among women.
  • Decreased significantly by 1.5% per year among white women.
  • Remained level among black women.
  • Decreased significantly by 1.1% per year among Hispanic* women.
  • Remained level among American Indian/Alaska Native women.
  • Remained level among Asian/Pacific Islander women.
Data source: Jemal A, Simard EP, Dorell C, Noone AM, Markowitz LE, Kohler B, Eheman C, Saraiya M, Bandi P, Saslow D, Cronin KA, Watson M, Schiffman M, Henley SJ, Schymura MJ, Anderson RN, Yankey D, and Edwards BK. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2009, featuring the burden and trends in HPV-associated cancers and HPV vaccination coverage levels. Journal of the National Cancer Institute; Published online date: January 7, 2013; Print issue date: February 1, 2013; Vol. 105, No. 3.
Note: Hispanic origin is not mutually exclusive from race categories (white, black, Asian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaska Native).
*Mortality data for Hispanic excludes the District of Columbia, Minnesota, New Hampshire, North Dakota, and South Carolina.
 

A questionnaire assessing women's care needs related to gynaecological cancer screening: development of the GCSCNS



Abstract

Objective

To identify women's care needs concerning cancer screening and to develop an instrument suitable for measuring them – the Gynaecological Cancer Screening Care Needs Scale (GCSCNS). We hypothesized that it is possible: (a) to explore care needs and to develop reliable subscales of them, (b) to rank these needs in order of importance, and (c) to detect determinants of these needs (age, social status, marital status, health locus of control) and these need scores.

Study design

A questionnaire was developed based on the relevant literature, interviews conducted with gynaecological patients, and a consultation with 18 experts. The questionnaire listed 58 items addressed to physicians which deal with information and support needs during gynaecological cancer screening. Subjects rated the importance of each item using a five-point scale (from 1=very important, to 5=not important). The questionnaire also asked for patients’ demographic information and their locus of control. It was distributed to 1000 female patients in 10 gynaecological practices in 3 federal states of Germany as an exploratory multi-centric cross-sectional study. A total of 961 women completed the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze patients’ demographic variables. With a principal component analysis (PCA, Varimax rotation), three care needs subscales were generated which then led to the GCSCNS scales.

Results

The dimensions of patients’ care needs can be described on three subscales: “Need for Information” (GCSCNS-I), “Need for Respect and Empathy during the physical examination” (GCSCNS-RE), “Need for Caring and Availability of the doctor” (GCSCNS-CA). Internal consistencies varied between good and very good (Cronbach's alpha .80–.89). Data indicate that it is possible to rank the female care needs in order of importance and that they are dependent on age and social status, but not on marital status and locus of control regarding health and disease.

Conclusion

Because there is no comparable research available on this topic, we developed an instrument for measuring female care needs related to gynaecological cancer screening. The results give gynaecologists the opportunity to better fulfil their patients’ wishes and needs and perhaps increase participation in gynaecological cancer screening.
 

Immunologic consequences of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: Impaired responses to the influenza vaccine



Abstract

Highlights

Patients undergoing treatment for ovarian cancer are profoundly immunosuppressed and unable to mount an adequate immune response to seasonal influenza vaccine.
The B cell compartment was significantly functionally compromised.
Monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis was seen.

Objectives

To examine the effect of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer on immunologic function and to define the effect on the serologic response to the influenza vaccine.

Methods

Under IRB approved protocols, patients with ovarian cancer were administered seasonal trivalent killed influenza vaccines. Peripheral blood was collected for immunologic assessments. Serum was analyzed for hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated to characterize T and B cell populations and function.

Results

Thirty-one patients were recruited: 13 in remission receiving a dendritic cell vaccine with or without a single dose of low-dose cyclophosphamide, 3 in remission not receiving treatment, and 15 undergoing standard therapy. Significant effects on T cell and B cell subset distributions were seen. Functional effects were also seen. Few patients were able to mount a 4-fold HAI antibody response. A 4-fold response was observed for H1N1 in 20%, for H3N2 in 26%, and for influenza B in 6%. Pre-existing exposure to influenza was predictive of responders.

Conclusions

Despite CDC recommendations that patients undergoing chemotherapy receive influenza vaccine, there is little evidence to support its serologic effectiveness in this population. Patients with ovarian cancer are almost uniformly unable to mount a meaningful antibody response. These findings have serious implications for future resource allocation for both seasonal and novel pandemic influenza outbreak and understanding the immunologic deficits as a result of chemotherapy may improve patient care.

Purchase $31.50
 

Monday, September 16, 2013

community / awareness events ovarian cancer - media September



search results past 30 days ovarian cancer

TO PUT THAT INTO CONTEXT...Advancing Patient-Centric Genomic Medicine



Cancer Network


As outlined by the National Cancer Institute, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is a large-scale pilot project, carried out in collaboration with the National Human Genome Research Institute for the purpose of furthering our understanding of the molecular basis of cancer through the application of genome analysis technologies, including but not limited to identifying mutations in DNA sequence, copy number variation, and alterations in methylation status. Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung is one of the three target diseases that are being studied in this pilot project. In this issue of ONCOLOGY, Devarakonda and colleagues[1] discuss the recently reported TCGA study, in which 178 tumor samples and matched normal tissue samples were subjected to whole exome and transcriptome sequencing.[2] It is clear that rapid progress is being made in the field of molecular diagnostics, which provides a powerful new approach that can help us better understand how cancers develop. The technology platforms to sequence the human genome are in a dizzying phase of innovation.
As we attempt to apply this explosion of information to specific clinical settings, we need to consider the critical issue of how to obtain the specimens that are urgently needed for continued genetic research and development of personalized medicine, while simultaneously maintaining rigorous respect for the donors of these specimens. The recent furor over the public posting of genetic data from the HeLa cell line can serve as a cautionary tale. Over 60 years ago, scientists took a tissue specimen of an aggressive cervical cancer from a young African American woman, Henrietta Lacks, without her knowledge or permission.

A note from history: Landmarks in history of cancer (1940-1970)



Abstract

Women with breast cancer may overestimate secondary risks | Reuters (reference to BRCA's)



Reuters

No Evidence of Disease trailer



No Evidence of Disease Official Trailer from Spark Media on Vimeo.

Examining the Effect of Teleconferences on Oncology Phase 1 Trials



open access

Women of Teal: We Did It! A Gyn Cancer Community is Formed!



Women of Teal: We Did It! A Gyn Cancer Community is Formed!

#gyncsm Community - gynecologic cancer - new twitter community



#gyncsm Community