The Cochrane Library - abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is often diagnosed at an advanced
stage, requiring primary cytoreductive surgery and combination
chemotherapy for its first-line management. Currently, the recommended
standard first-line chemotherapy is platinum-based, usually consisting
of carboplatin and paclitaxel (PAC/carbo). Pegylated liposomal
doxorubicin (PLD) is an improved formulation of doxorubicin that is
associated with fewer and less severe side effects than are seen with
non-modified doxorubicin. In combination with carboplatin, PLD has
recently been shown to improve progression-free survival compared with
PAC/carbo in women with relapsed, platinum-sensitive EOC.
It is
therefore important to know whether any survival benefit can be
attributed to PLD when it is used in the first-line setting.
Objectives
To evaluate the role of PLD, alone or in combination, in first-line chemotherapy for women with EOC.
Search methods
We
searched The Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group's Trial Register, the
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and
EMBASE from January 1990 to February 2013. In addition, we searched
online trial registries for ongoing trials and abstracts of studies
presented at relevant scientific meetings from 2000 onwards.
Selection criteria
We
included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared PLD
alone or in combination with other agent/s (e.g. carboplatin) versus
other agent/s for first-line chemotherapy in women with EOC who may or
may not have undergone primary cytoreductive surgery.
Data collection and analysis
Two
review authors independently selected trials, extracted data and
assessed the risk of bias for each included trial. We obtained updated
trial data when possible.
Main results
We
included two large trials. One trial compared three-weekly PLD and
carboplatin (PLD/carbo) with PAC/carbo. The
other trial included four
experimental arms, one of which was PLD plus PAC/carbo, that were
compared with the standard PAC/carbo regimen. We did not combine results
of these two trials in the meta-analysis. We considered the two studies
to be at
low risk of bias.
For the comparison PLD/carbo versus
PAC/carbo (820 women; stages
Ic to IV), no statistically significant
differences in progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01,
95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 1.19) or overall survival (OS) (HR
0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.13) were noted between study arms. Severe anaemia
(risk ratio [RR] 2.74, 95% CI 1.54 to 4.88) and thrombocytopenia (RR
8.09, 95% CI 3.93 to 16.67) were significantly more common with
PLD/carbo, whereas alopecia (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.14) and severe
neurotoxicity (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.66) were significantly more
common with PAC/carbo. Quality of life scores were not significantly
different.
For the comparison PLD/PAC/carbo versus PAC/carbo
(1726 women; stage III/IV), it is important to note that PLD was given
for alternate cycles only (i.e. every 6 weeks). No statistically
significant difference in PFS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.09) or OS (HR
0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.08) between these two treatment arms was
reported. However, women in the triplet arm experienced significantly
more severe haematological adverse events (anaemia, thrombocytopenia,
neutropenia and febrile neutropenia) compared with those given standard
treatment.
No RCTs evaluated single-agent PLD for first-line treatment of EOC.
Authors' conclusions
PLD/carbo
is a reasonable alternative to PAC/carbo for the first-line treatment
of EOC. Although three-weekly PLD/carbo may be associated with increased
dose delays and discontinuations compared with the standard PAC/carbo
regimen, it might be more acceptable to women who wish to avoid alopecia
or those at high risk of neurotoxicity.
No survival benefits appear to
be associated with the alternating triplet regimen, and the additional
toxicity associated with adding PLD to PAC/carbo limits further
investigation. Further studies are needed to establish the safest, most
effective PLD/carbo regimen for newly diagnosed disease.
Plain language summary
A modified formulation of doxorubicin for the treatment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer
Background
PLD
is an improved formulation of an anticancer drug that has been around
since the 1960s. When used with carboplatin (carbo), it has been shown
to improve survival in women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) that
has come back (relapsed) six months or longer after the last platinum
(carbo)-based treatment.
Methods
We
wanted to find out whether PLD was also useful for the treatment of
newly diagnosed EOC. We searched the literature from 1990 to January
2013 for relevant studies and included two studies in this review.
Study characteristics
One
study compared PLD plus carbo given to women every three weeks versus
the standard treatment (paclitaxel (PAC)/carbo every three weeks), and
the other added PLD to the standard treatment and compared it with
standard treatment only (the latter study also included other treatments
not relevant to this review). These studies spanned three years and
included 820 and 4100 women, respectively. Most women in these studies
had advanced cancer and had undergone surgery to remove as much of the
cancer as possible.
Key findings
Women
receiving the PLD/carbo treatment and those given the standard
treatment survived for a similar period, but PLD/carbo caused more women
to experience low blood counts (anaemia and low platelets) that often
led to a delay in treatment or the need to stop treatment. However,
PLD/carbo caused far fewer women to experience hair loss and neuropathy
(nerve damage causing symptoms such as tingling, numbness, pain, loss of
sensation and/or coordination), and so it might help women who find
these side effects unacceptable or intolerable. We concluded that
three-weekly PLD/carbo is a reasonable alternative to standard
platinum-based treatment for newly diagnosed EOC, but more research is
needed to establish the safest and most effective dosage and dose
frequency.
Adding PLD to standard treatment (PAC/carbo) every six
weeks did not help women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer survive
longer and was associated with worse effects on blood counts that
increased the chance of infection; therefore this triple drug treatment
cannot be recommended.
Quality of the evidence
We
considered the evidence related to survival of women after they are
treated with PLD/carbo or PAC/carbo, and the evidence related to adverse
drug effects to be of
high quality.
Summary of findings [Explanations] open access