OVARIAN CANCER and US

Blog Archives: Nov 2004 - present

#ovariancancers



Special items: Ovarian Cancer and Us blog best viewed in Firefox

Search This Blog

Monday, January 09, 2017

OA: Of mice and women - Non-ovarian origins of “ovarian” cancer



Of mice and women - Non-ovarian origins of “ovarian” cancer

 
For many years, pathologists, clinicians, and researchers assumed that OCs arise from the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) primarily because the dominant, and sometimes only, mass is found in the ovaries of women at presentation. The problem was compounded by the presence of widely disseminated disease at the time of diagnosis in many women with OC, particularly those with HGSC – obscuring potential “in situ” or precursor lesions. Many, if not most, HGSCs are now believed to arise from Müllerian epithelium, specifically the fallopian tube epithelium (FTE) on the tubal fimbriae, rather than the OSE [9] and [10]. The notion that HGSC often arises in the fallopian tube is strongly supported by the identification of occult tubal HGSCs and their presumptive precursors known as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas (STICs) in up to 12% of women with germline BRCA1/2 mutations who underwent risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] and [16]. Importantly, in a study in which all resected fallopian tube tissue was examined from 41 women with tubo-ovarian or primary peritoneal HGSCs, tubal origin was presumed in nearly two-thirds based on the presence of tubal HGSC or STIC [17]. In three additional studies, STIC or invasive HGSC was confined to the tube in 22 of 29 cases in which tubo-ovarian HGSC was incidentally found in women without known or suspected genetic predisposition [18], [19] and [20]. Collectively, these reports provide strong evidence for tubal origin of sporadic HGSCs as well those arising in the high-risk context.
While supporting the conclusion that most HGSCs likely arise from tubal precursors, these studies raise some important questions.....

Editorial Gynecologic Oncology 2017 Update: New Features and Expanded Scope



pdf

Tumor-associated macrophage expression of PD-L1 in implants of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (primary vs metastatic)



abstract:
Tumor-associated macrophage expression of PD-L1 in implants of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A comparison of matched primary and metastatic tumors

Highlights

Eight percent of primary tumors demonstrated PD-L1 expression in tumor cells.
The majority of tumors showed PD-L1 positive tumor-associated macrophages.
PD-L1 expression correlated in primary tumors and matched implants.
 

Ovarian cancer and the immune system - Correspondence/original research



Ovarian cancer and the immune system


Highlights

The immune system is an important player in ovarian cancer behaviour
Intratumoral studies of the immune system show an overwhelming immunosuppression
The immune signature in the blood can be important as a new biomarker.

Short communication in response to the review of Turner et al. entitled "Ovarian cancer and the immune system - the role of targeted therapies" published in Gynecological Oncology. We believe systemic immune parameters might be a good alternative to tumor biopsy to gain insight in the immunological background of ovarian cancer.

 With great interest, we read the review of Turner et al. entitled “Ovarian cancer and the immune system – the role of targeted therapies” published in Gynecological Oncology ( Turner et al., 2016). The authors intelligibly describe the complexity of the immune system in cancer in a clinically relevant manner. Novel information concerning the immune system in cancer is constantly emerging. Currently, there are several immunotherapy trials, recruiting ovarian cancer patients. However, selecting the patients who might have the most chance of having a beneficial effect of immunotherapy is difficult......

OA: Pathological features and clinical behavior of Lynch syndrome-associated ovarian cancer (UK)



open access

The most common histological subtype in our cohort was endometrioid adenocarcinoma but high-grade serous tumors were also seen.

Historically, ovarian cancer has been categorized based on morphology into Type I and Type II disease [16], although modern genetic approaches call into question the utility of such an approach, favoring genetic categorization based on mutation status as it better predicts prognosis and treatment response [16], [17] and [18].

Highlights

Lynch syndrome-associated ovarian cancer (LSAOC) is rare and difficult to study.
This is the largest reported series of OC from proven Lynch syndrome carriers.
Endometrioid OC was most common, followed by high grade serous, clear cell and mixed histology.
Most LSAOC was detected at stage 1 and overall 5-year survival was excellent at 80%.
Surveillance found 2 LSAOC; 3 more were diagnosed following surgery for screen-detected endometrial cancer.
In total 1047 proven mutation carriers are included in the database. Of these, 577 are women. Only those with a confirmed diagnosis of Lynch syndrome based on germline sequencing were included in this study. Fig. 1 outlines the numbers of patients included and excluded at each stage of stratification.
  The mean age of diagnosis was 51 years (range 24–70 years). Diagnosis In total, there were 17 MLH1, 28 MSH2 and 7 MSH6 proven mutation carriers. The mean age of LSAOC in MLH1 was 48 years, in MSH2 it was 52 years and in MSH6 the average was 53 years. There was no significant difference between age at diagnosis of LSAOC and mutated gene (p = 0.51 ANOVA), although numbers are small. Of the 36 women with complete datasets (Table 1), eight met the Bethesda criteria for diagnosis of Lynch syndrome; this constitutes just 22% of the cohort.of OC dated from 1956 to 2015.
 Synchronous endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia was seen in 9 women (25%).


podcast: author/book Miracles We Have Seen: Astonishing Medical Stories That Defy Logic



podcast (re: book author - 15 min)
not specific to cancer - general topic

Dr. Harley Rotbart shares stories from his book, a collection of medical miracles reported by physicians around the country.

In Ovarian Cancer Advancements, Finding New Biomarkers Is Key



In Ovarian Cancer Advancements, Finding New Biomarkers Is Key
 Interview: Maurie Markman
 Finding new biomarkers should be the top priority in ovarian cancer research, Maurie Markman, M.D., says

Sunday, January 08, 2017

(repost) Canada - Care Delivery Patterns, Processes, and Outcomes for Primary Ovarian Cancer Surgery - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada



abstract: Care Delivery Patterns, Processes, and Outcomes for Primary Ovarian Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Review Using a National Administrative Database - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Abstract
In this pan-Canadian study, we sought to elucidate the current state of surgical care for primary ovarian cancers and factors influencing selected short-term outcomes; these were in-hospital mortality (IHM), major complications (MCs), failure-to-rescue (FTR), and hospital length of stay (LOS). 

Molecular Profiling of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer - My Cancer Genome



My Cancer Genome
Last Updated: January 26, 2016
 My Cancer Genome is managed by the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Endometrioid Carcinoma of the Ovary: Outcomes Compared to Serous Carcinoma After 10 Years of Follow-UpI



abstract
 

OBJECTIVES:

The prognostic significance of endometrioid ovarian cancer is unclear. In this study we compared rates of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival between patients with endometrioid and serous ovarian cancers using long-term follow-up data.

METHODS:

We included patients with endometrioid or serous ovarian cancers diagnosed at a single regional cancer centre between 1988 and 2006. Data on baseline and treatment characteristics were collected retrospectively. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazard models to determine the independent effect of histology on death or recurrence, adjusting for age, tumour grade, primary cytoreductive surgery, year of diagnosis, adjuvant treatment, and stage.

RESULTS:

Five hundred and thirty-three women with ovarian cancer were included in the study cohort; 98 (18.4%) had endometrioid histology and 435 (81.6%) serous histology.

Genotype-matched treatment for patients with advanced type I epithelial ovarian cancer



 Type I tumors have low grade serous, clear cell, endometrioid, and mucinous histological features
             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
abstract

Highlights

  • Genotyping and next generation sequencing can identify actionable mutations.
  • High frequency of clinically actionable mutations was found in type I EOC patients.
  • RAS mutated type I EOC patients received genotype-matched MEKinhibitor combinations.
  • Tumor shrinkage and sustained responses were seen in this patient population.

Abstract

Background

Genomic alterations that activate the MAPK signaling pathway frequently occur in Type I Epithelial Ovarian Cancers (EOCs). We evaluated therapeutic response outcomes in patients with type I EOC treated with genotype-matched therapy on clinical trials enrolled in a prospective molecular profiling program.

Material and methods

Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissues were prospectively screened for genomic alterations using MALDI-ToF mass-spectrometry platform or targeted sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq TruSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel. Treatment outcomes on genotype-matched trials were retrospectively reviewed using RECIST version 1.1 and Gynecological Cancer Intergroup CA125 related-response criteria

Results

55 patients with type I EOC underwent molecular profiling, 41 (75%) low grade serous (LGS), 9 (16%) clear cell (CC), and 5 (9%) mucinous (MC) histologies. Thirty-five patients (64%) were found to have ≥1 somatic mutations: 23 KRAS, 6 NRAS, 5 PIK3CA, 2 PTEN, 1 BRAF, 1 AKT, 1 TP53, and 1 CTNNB1. Fifteen patients were subsequently enrolled in genotype-matched phase I or II trials, including 14 patients with KRAS/NRAS mutations treated with MEK inhibitor targeted combinations. Among 14 RECIST evaluable patients, there were 7 partial responses (PR), 7 stable disease (SD) and 1 disease progression (PD). CA125 responses were observed in 10/10 evaluable KRAS/NRAS mutant patients treated with MEK inhibitor combinations

Conclusions

Genotyping and targeted sequencing of Type I EOCs frequently identifies actionable mutations. Matched treatment with MEK-based combination therapy in KRAS and/or NRAS mutant type I EOC patients is an active therapeutic strategy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: It's all about selection



highlights

 Patients that cannot be optimal cytoreduced can be offered neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 
When appropriately used, neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces postoperative morbidity. 
Clinical trials are needed to optimize treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Purchase access to this article

Variations in Facebook Posting Patterns Across Validated Patient Health Conditions



open access:
JMIR-Variations in Facebook Posting Patterns Across Validated Patient Health Conditions: A Prospective Cohort Study Journal of Medical Internet Research

 There were no significant differences in Facebook posting frequencies between patients with and without the following conditions: hypertension, diabetes, headaches, back pain, anemia, and cancer. After using an ANCOVA model to control for age, race, and sex, the depression screen and depression medical history were the only health outcomes that showed significant differences in mean posting quantities between patients with and without a disease (Table 3).

Results: A total of 695 patients consented to provide access to their EMR and social media data.....

Saturday, January 07, 2017

Cancers Evade Immunotherapy By 'Discarding the Evidence' of Tumor-Specific Mutations



media: hopkinsmedicine

Do Blood Tests Change When Processed at Different Labs?



video/interview (4:19 min)

Euthanasia embedded in palliative care. Responses to essentialistic criticisms of the Belgian model of integral end-of-life care



abstract
Euthanasia embedded in palliative care. Responses to essentialistic criticisms of the Belgian model of integral end-of-life care -- Journal of Medical Ethics

The Belgian model of ‘integral’ end-of-life care consists of universal access to palliative care (PC) and legally regulated euthanasia. As a first worldwide, the Flemish PC organisation has embedded euthanasia in its practice. However, some critics have declared the Belgian-model concepts of ‘integral PC’ and ‘palliative futility’ to fundamentally contradict the essence of PC. This article analyses the various essentialistic arguments for the incompatibility of euthanasia and PC. The empirical evidence from the euthanasia-permissive Benelux countries shows that since legalisation, carefulness (of decision making) at the end of life has improved and there have been no significant adverse ‘slippery slope’ effects. It is problematic that some critics disregard the empirical evidence as epistemologically irrelevant in a normative ethical debate. Next, rejecting euthanasia because its prevention was a founding principle of PC ignores historical developments. Further, critics' ethical positions depart from the PC tenet of patient centeredness by prioritising caregivers' values over patients' values. Also, many critics' canonical (clergy) adherence to the WHO definition of PC, which has intention as the ethical criterion is objectionable. A rejection of the Belgian model on doctrinal grounds also has nefarious practical consequences such as the marginalisation of PC in euthanasia-permissive countries, the continuation of clandestine practices and problematic palliative sedation until death. In conclusion, major flaws of essentialistic arguments against the Belgian model include the disregard of empirical evidence, appeals to canonical and questionable definitions, prioritisation of caregiver perspectives over those of patients and rejection of a plurality of respectable views on decision making at the end of life.

DNA-Testing Startup Counsyl Lays Off 5% Of Its Workforce



genomics Articles

MD Anderson to cut around 800 to 900 jobs from cancer center



media

 The layoffs, DePinho said, will begin immediately, and physicians would not be affected by the reductions.

The Importance of Appendectomy in Surgery for Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Ovary



abstract
 

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to assess the importance of appendectomy during surgery for mucinous ovarian cancer. It can be difficult to distinguish between primary ovarian and primary appendiceal cancers clinically, histologically, and immunohistochemically. Removal of the appendix may facilitate differential diagnosis, improve staging, and possibly increase 5-year survival but may also be associated with increased postsurgical morbidity. In the largest population published to date, we analyze and discuss these matters.

METHODS:

Prospectively gathered data on 269 patients with confirmed mucinous ovarian adenocarcinoma from a national database were analyzed. The impact of appendectomy and metastases to the appendix on 5-year and overall survival was analyzed.

RESULTS:

Appendectomy was performed in 172 cases (64%), and in 10 cases (4%), pathologic evaluation of the removed appendix revealed metastases from ovarian cancer. Three of the cases were macroscopically normal, and metastases were discovered only during microscopic evaluation. Patients with metastatic disease to the appendix had significantly worse 5-year survival (22%) compared with patients without metastases (73%) (χ = 31.998, P < 0.0001). Equally, 5-year survival was significantly higher in patients who had been adequately staged with hysterectomy, omentectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and appendectomy (74% vs 52%, χ = 7.322, P = 0.007).

Lynch syndrome in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: significance, screening, and surveillance



abstract
 
Purpose of review: Lynch syndrome is a genetic syndrome that integrates a large spectrum of cancers caused by germline mutations in mismatch repair genes. Its incidence is underestimated due to a lack of systematic screening in the population. Because upper tract urothelial carcinoma is the third-most common cancer associated with the syndrome, urologists should be aware of the diagnostic pathway.
Recent findings: Lynch syndrome can be positively diagnosed after the three following distinct steps: meeting the clinical criteria, tissue and genetic testing, and familial genetic counseling. It must be suspected for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma before the age of 60 years and in cases of evocative personal/familial medical histories. When a diagnosis is suspected, immunohistochemistry and Polymerase Chain Reaction are the next steps to confirm the diagnosis. After confirmation, the key to management is a good surveillance to prevent disease recurrence using urinary analysis and imaging as well as screening of first-degree relatives.
Summary: Despite the lack of high-level studies of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Lynch syndrome, its prevalence is not negligible. Thus, expert recommendations are required for its management. Individuals and family should be informed of the importance of close screening and surveillance.

Friday, January 06, 2017

Failure to treat chronic pain real issue behind prescription opioid epidemic



blog: Failure to treat chronic pain real issue behind prescription opioid epidemic | rabble.ca

(not a patients included conference) Registration - e-Health Annual Conference Toronto 2017



Note: fee schedule

Registration - e-Health Annual Conference

OA: “Back to a false normality”: new intriguing mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors



open access:
“Back to a false normality”: new intriguing mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors
 
 Table 1: Phase II and III clinical trials investigated PARP inhibitors in breast and ovarian cancer.

 Abstract
Several evidences have shown that BRCA mutations increased tumor-cells sensitivity to PARP inhibitors by synthetic lethality leading to an accelerated development of several compounds targeting the PARP enzymes system as anticancer agents for clinical setting. Most of such compounds have been investigated in ovarian and breast cancer, showing promising efficacy in BRCA-mutated patients. Recently clinical studies of PARP-inhibitors have been extended across different tumor types harboring BRCA-mutations, including also “BRCA-like” sporadic tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). This review summarizes the biological background underlying PARP-inhibition, reporting the results of the most relevant clinical trials carried out in patients treated with PARP inhibitors alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Molecular mechanisms responsible for the occurrence of both primary and acquired resistance have been elucidated, in order to support the development of new treatment strategies.

 PARPi have been developed and tested in clinical trials to treat patients carrying BRCA1/2 mutations. These genetic alterations have been detected in about 17% of patients with ovarian cancer, mainly high grade serous adenocarcinoma.
Clinical development of PARP inhibitors

To date there are about ten molecules, including olaparib, veliparib, rucaparib, niraparib, among those in more advanced stages of experimental development. The majority of such studies have been focused on solid tumors harboring germ-line BRCA1-2 mutations, mainly ovarian and breast, but also prostate or pancreatic cancers. However the use of PARP inhibitors as single agent was extended also to “BRCA-like” sporadic tumors with suspected homologous recombination (HR) genes defects, including high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Furthermore the peculiar mechanisms of action of such compounds has led to evaluate potential combinations with both DNA damaging cytotoxic agents, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and targeted agents able to induce HR dysfunctions, such as CDK1, PI3K, PTEN and HSP90 inhibitors or anti-angiogenic drugs.

Ovarian cancer

Fong et al have has first demonstrated the activity of single agent PARP inhibitor olaparib in BRCA-deficient advanced ovarian, breast and prostate cancers [43], with greater activity observed in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer patients [44]. Response rates of 30% have been reported in a subsequent phase II studies conducted in refractory advanced BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer [45], suggesting BRCA1-2 mutations as potential predictive biomarkers for clinical use. However another phase II study including both BRCA mutant and wild type patients with breast cancer and HGSOC showed encouraging activity also in the cohort of wild type, platinum-sensitive HGSOC patients [46], likely due to the acquired defects of HR genes responsible for “BRCA-like phenotype”, which conferred the same sensitivity to both platinum-chemotherapy and PARP inhibition. All such findings have led to the design of a randomized phase III, placebo controlled trial, of olaparib as single agent maintenance therapy in patients with recurrent HGSOC who responded to prior platinum-based chemotherapy, showing a significant improvement of 3.6 months progression free survival (PFS) in the overall population (HR: 0.35, p < 0·001), with the greatest increment of 6.9 months PFS (HR 0.18, p < 0.0001) occurring in the subgroup of patients with BRCA mutations [47]. The updated analysis of the study 19 has recently shown a significant overall survival benefit limited to the BRCA mutant patients (34.9 vs 30.2 months; HR: 0.62, p = 0.025), which was not extended to the wild type population (HR 0.83, p = 0.37). As expected adverse events like fatigue, anemia, nausea and vomiting were significantly higher with olaparib than placebo [48]. On the basis of such positive results olaparib was the first PARP-inhibitor receiving the approval by the European Medical Agency (EMA) at doses of 400 mg twice daily as maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive patients with advanced HGSOC, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, harboring BRCA-mutations. A companion diagnostic test has been also approved by FDA to identify mutations in BRCA1/2 genes using DNA obtained from a blood sample. Along with olaparib, several other PARP inhibitors, including veliparib, rucaparib and niraparib have shown encouraging activity and acceptable safety profile in early phase I-II studies. In particular the phase II randomized ARIAL 2 study of rucaparib has shown an objective response rate (ORR) of 80% and median PFS of 12.8 months in BRCA-mutant platinum sensitive patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and ORR 39% with and median PFS of 7.2 months in BRCA wild type patients with a BRCA-like signature, compared to ORR of 13% and median PFS of 5 months in biomarker negative patients. Rucaparib was associated with a manageable safety profile, including nausea, asthenia/fatigue and ALT/AST elevations among the most common treatment-related AEs [49, 50]. These impressive results led to the recent Breakthrough Therapy designation status of rucaparib by the FDA for the treatment of ovarian cancer, while the ARIEL3 randomized study is currently recruiting patients. Veliparib has recently shown a significant activity and tolerable safety profile as single agent in a phase II single arm trial including ovarian cancer patients carrying a germline BRCA1-2 mutation who progressed to prior chemotherapy regimens, reporting ORR of 35% and 20% in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients, respectively [51]. A phase 3 trial is currently ongoing in order to further elucidate the potential of this drug in such setting. Niraparib 300 mg/day has shown a good safety profile and a promising activity with ORR 40% in pre-treated ovarian cancer patients with BRCA 1-2 mutations [52]. The phase III randomized ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial investigated the PARP inhibitor niraparib as single agent maintenance therapy in patients with recurrent, platinum sensitive HGSOC, stratified by BRCA-mutation status. The study has met its primary end-point showing a significant PFS improvement both in BRCA-mutant (HR: 0.27; p < 0.001) and in BRCA-wild type (HR: 0.45; p < 0.0001) populations. A further analysis of BRCA-wild type patients identified the subgroup of HRD-positive patients who receive more benefit (HR: 0.38; p < 0.001) compared to HRD-negative patients (HR: 0.58; p < 0.0226) [53]. The large benefit observed in the overall population included in the NOVA study could led to a fast approval of niraparib in the treatment of platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, regardless of BRCA-status. An alternative approach has been investigated by another phase II randomized trial comparing olaparib plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin), followed by olaparib single agent maintenance versus chemotherapy alone in platinum-sensitive recurrent HGSOC patients. The results of such trial showed that combining olaparib 200 mg twice daily for 10 days of each cycle with lower dose of carboplatin (AUC 4) plus paclitaxel, followed by olaparib 400 mg twice daily as maintenance treatment is an effective and tolerable option leading to a significant 2.6-month PFS advantage (HR 0.51, p = 0.0012), with the greatest clinical benefit in BRCA-mutated patients (HR: 0.21, p = 0.0015) [54]. The addition of veliparib to cyclophosphamide didn’t improve RR and PFS in patients with recurrent HGSOC [55], while another phase II randomized study comparing veliparib plus temozolomide vs PLD in the same setting of patients has just completed recruitment (NCT01113957, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ). A very promising strategy emerged from the phase II randomized trial by Liu et al. which showed a further PFS benefit from adding the anti-angiogenic agent cediranib to olaparib for platinum-sensitive, recurrent, HGSOC, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (median PFS 17.7 vs 9 months; (HR: 0.42; p = 0·005) [56], warranting investigation in a phase III ongoing trial. Similarly a phase I-II study is currently comparing tolerability and efficacy of niraparib alone versus niraparib-bevacizumab combination versus sequential bevacizumab and niraparib in platinum sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer [57], while the PAOLA1 trial is currently investigating first-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab plus olaparib or placebo as maintenance treatment. Finally the combination of olaparib and PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor Durvalumab has shown promising durable long-term responses and a tolerable safety profile in pre-treated ovarian cancer and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients [58].....

 Finally PARPi and PD1/PDL1 checkpoint inhibitors combinations have recently shown durable responses, emerging as another promising strategy to expand the treatment arsenal against cancer.

New findings on acquired resistance

Since the advent of PARP inhibitors for cancer treatment, there are growing evidences showing that not all patients with BRCAness genes alterations report the same treatment responses. Commonly to other targeted treatments the majority of tumors will develop acquired resistance within 1 year of therapy, leading to the disease progression and the subsequent discontinuation of cancer treatment [73]. It’s likely that the different emerging mechanisms of resistance may depend from the original BRCAness gene alterated, ultimately leading to different patterns of treatment response observed in clinical setting [98].
Considering the recent introduction of PARP inhibitors for clinical use, there is currently very limited understanding about the molecular mechanisms underlying the occurrence of acquired resistance to this family of drugs.....

2017 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium (abstracts available Feb 13th)



Abstracts | Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
 

FEBRUARY 13, 2017

Abstracts Released on Meeting Library

OA: Laparoscopy to Predict the Result of Primary Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer



 also refer to prior blog posting (2012):

 Tuesday, January 24, 2012

open access - BMC Cancer Laparoscopy to predict the result of primary cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients (LapOvCa-trial): a multicentre randomized controlled study (protocol/design/Netherlands)

Study protocol

Laparoscopy to predict the result of primary cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients (LapOvCa-trial): a multicentre randomized controlled study

BMC Cancer 2012, 12:31 doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-31          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
open access:
Laparoscopy to Predict the Result of Primary Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Journal of Clinical Oncology
 
Patients
Between May 2011 and February 2015, we enrolled 202 patients. One patient was randomly assigned incorrectly because there was no suspicion of advanced-stage ovarian cancer; this patient was therefore excluded from all analyses. Data on the remaining 201 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis; 102 were assigned to receive laparoscopy before surgery and 99 to PCS (Fig 1). All patients received a preoperative CT scan of the abdomen and lower thorax and a chest x-ray or CT scan of the thorax. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment groups (Table 1).....

OA: Reaffirming and Clarifying the ASCO’s Policy Statement on the Critical Role of Phase I Trials in Cancer Research and Treatment



open access:
Reaffirming and Clarifying the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s Policy Statement on the Critical Role of Phase I Trials in Cancer Research and Treatment: Journal of Clinical Oncology: Vol 35, No 2

Is Participation in Cancer Phase I Trials Really Therapeutic?



Journal of Clinical Oncology